Quote (Meanwhile @ 26 Jul 2023 00:35)
Clowns are those saying it's a tank:
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a42407360/is-amx-10rc-combat-vehicle-a-tank/The AMX-10RC is heavily armed by Merriam-Webster’s definition, but lacks the heavy armor and tracks that the dictionary site specifies. Dictionary.com is a bit more liberal in its description, but the French vehicle lacks the caterpillar treads the reference site specifically mentions. Again, the U.S. Army mentions tracks, and though the AMX-10RC arguably has “lethal firepower” and “audacious maneuver”abilities, its thin armor—rather than “unparalleled survivability”—disqualifies it from being a true tank.
https://i.imgur.com/G64LpsW.mp4"The vehicle can be described as a wheeled tank destroyer. It has also been described as a light tank, though its classification as a tank has been disputed (probably by Meanwhile) it is described by the term "char" (tank) in French service."
If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.
Or may stop using Pediwikia as a source from now on. Your choice.
Quote (ofthevoid @ 26 Jul 2023 00:51)
Tushonka?
When it's AMX-10RC, it's a delicacy frog leg tushonka
This post was edited by Norlander on Jul 25 2023 04:01pm