d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russiagate Gathering Steam?
Prev1315316317318319445Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Nov 28 2018 11:51am
Mueller is going all in on Manafort because he knows its his only chance to link to Trump.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Nov 28 2018 12:05pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ 28 Nov 2018 18:51)
Mueller is going all in on Manafort because he knows its his only chance to link to Trump.


Look like you forgot Trump Jr
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Nov 28 2018 12:26pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Nov 28 2018 11:51am)
Mueller is going all in on Manafort because he knows its his only chance to link to Trump.


Didn't know you were privy to all of the information that Mueller has access to.
Member
Posts: 92,993
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Nov 28 2018 12:32pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Nov 28 2018 11:51am)
Mueller is going all in on Manafort because he knows its his only chance to link to Trump.



it's no surprise either, as he's actively connected with the Russians from Ukrainian dealings, and was a staple in the campaign. I can't think of a single person more important to the campaign while also having confirmed contacts with the Russians. Don Jr has the trump tower meeting but he was a face in the campaign only, and the meeting was underwhelming. Flynn reached out to the Ruskies but post election. Assange himself is likely the best candidate for the whole story, but has zero credibility given the corner he's in and no campaign connection. Rudy is a campaign staple, but the only indication that he had russia knowledge was his smug "we have something up out sleeve" comment that clearly eluded to the Comey drop (days before the comey drop). Then there's Roger stone, weakly connected to the campaign and strongly connected with Wikileaks, but also willing to go to prison more than likely to avoid talking.

water follows the path of least resistance. he could collect info and try to shakedown some of the other campaign people like Rudy or Stone but they'll probably plead the 5th.
Member
Posts: 40,248
Joined: Feb 14 2007
Gold: 5,737.99
Nov 28 2018 12:36pm
Quote (IceMage @ Nov 28 2018 08:55am)
You have to wonder if it was some intentional strategy.

Quote (Surfpunk @ Nov 28 2018 09:22am)
It wouldn't surprise me at all for Mueller to have fed Manafort a line of BS which he'd take to Trump, and Trump just submitted the written answers to Mueller's questioning.




Quote (ThatAlex @ Nov 28 2018 12:07pm)
I haven't seen anything affirmatively disproving The Guardian's story, but if Manafort visited Assange, there should be a video available somewhere to prove it. Since the story's release, The Guardian has weakened its own language and haven't demonstrated any proof for their claims. Their sourcing is thin and obscured at best, and I think skepticism is justified.

That said, if the story is true, it's devastating on the collusion front.


Manafort was under FBI surveillance during the time they’re claiming he met Assange, so if it is indeed true, they shouldn’t have any trouble proving it.
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Nov 28 2018 12:57pm
nvm

This post was edited by Surfpunk on Nov 28 2018 12:59pm
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Nov 28 2018 03:12pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ Nov 28 2018 09:22am)
It wouldn't surprise me at all for Mueller to have fed Manafort a line of BS which he'd take to Trump, and Trump just submitted the written answers to Mueller's questioning. Interesting to see where that will run.


https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/28/opinion/manafort-pardon-trump-mueller-pardon-.html

Excerpt:
Quote
Some analysts speculate that Mr. Mueller intended this result — that he knew that Mr. Manafort would lie to him, knew that Mr. Manafort’s lawyers would brief Mr. Trump on those lies, and knew that Mr. Trump would foolishly repeat those lies in his written statement to Mr. Mueller, thus committing a new federal crime.

That’s a good plot for a legal thriller, but it’s not how real federal prosecutors work. Mr. Mueller is a by-the-book sort of prosecutor, not one to indulge in such ploys. To the extent he trusted Mr. Manafort and revealed details of his investigation, he made a mistake. Of course, the president’s team — never a font of shrewd criminal defense strategy — may have made a mistake, too, if they incorporated Mr. Manafort’s lies into their own written responses to Mr. Mueller’s questions. That could expand the scope of Mr. Mueller’s investigation to include new false statements to the F.B.I., the downfall of several of his targets.


Rest of article is good as well.
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Nov 28 2018 03:58pm
Quote (IceMage @ Nov 28 2018 03:12pm)


That makes sense. It also brought up a very salient point about the validity of a JDA when one of the parties to it has started cooperating with the government.
Member
Posts: 50,901
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,836.00
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1315316317318319445Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll