d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1314931503151315231534529Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 14,755
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 100,701.50
Jul 11 2023 12:44pm
Quote (Meanwhile @ Jul 11 2023 08:35pm)
Thoughs and Prayers to Americans sacrifying their healthcare & welfare for bringing Ukraine, a promising ressource, into EU. Along with massively helping in disabling russian mafia.

These 3 points are demolishing the "coup" designation made by russian propagandists:

- Yanukovich deliberately lied about joining EU / investments to get elected, then later turned back: protests were perfectly justified
- Yanukovich pro-russian secret police used paid thugs in an attempt to turn the protests into violent riots to proceed (and excuse) repression
- Constitutional vote: Ukraine’s parliament voted 328–0 (about 73% of its 447 members) to remove President Viktor Yanukovich


Your opinion ^^

Presidents sometimes take decisions that parliament doesn't agree with. Remember Macron's pension reform? Macron took a very controversial decision. You say that protests in such case are perfectly justified, now should a foreign power like Russia or China stage a coup in France and claim that "it's justified" because of that?

They could even call it French spring how about that ;)

E: look at Biden, he just signed a waiver so he can send cluster munitions to Ukraine. Hmm? LMK


This post was edited by Djunior on Jul 11 2023 12:45pm
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jul 11 2023 12:54pm
Quote (Djunior @ 11 Jul 2023 20:44)
Your opinion ^^
Presidents sometimes take decisions that parliament doesn't agree with. Remember Macron's pension reform? Macron took a very controversial decision. You say that protests in such case are perfectly justified, now should a foreign power like Russia or China stage a coup in France and claim that "it's justified" because of that?
They could even call it French spring how about that ;)
E: look at Biden, he just signed a waiver so he can send cluster munitions to Ukraine. Hmm? LMK


Not my opinion; each point is documented in wikipedia...
Macron's pension reform is completely out of the subject and unrelated. Such a deeply stupid attempt to move goals.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Yanukovych#Fleeing_to_Russia
'The EU association agreement was signed on 29 May 2014, after his removal"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titushky
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Yanukovych#Removal_from_presidency

This post was edited by Meanwhile on Jul 11 2023 01:00pm
Member
Posts: 14,755
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 100,701.50
Jul 11 2023 01:07pm
Quote (Meanwhile @ Jul 11 2023 08:54pm)
Not my opinion; each point is documented in wikipedia...
Macron's pension reform is completely out of the subject and unrelated. Such a deeply stupid attempt to move goals.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Yanukovych#Fleeing_to_Russia
'The EU association agreement was signed on 29 May 2014, after his removal"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titushky
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Yanukovych#Removal_from_presidency


It's completely clear that my point is that presidents can take controversial decisions, in no way shape or form am I comparing the pension reforms to Euromaidan.

My god your reading comprehension :wacko:

This post was edited by Djunior on Jul 11 2023 01:08pm
Member
Posts: 14,755
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 100,701.50
Jul 11 2023 01:09pm
Anyways this is what's it all about guys, topic can be closed now

Member
Posts: 1,559
Joined: Nov 11 2021
Gold: 10.00
Jul 11 2023 01:09pm
Explains his complete ignorance tho
Member
Posts: 51,724
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 15,520.00
Jul 11 2023 01:09pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Jul 11 2023 07:15pm)
yes of course we've carried out many coups. its just that most of the time our modus operandi is to EITHER pay off almost everyone in power and rule by proxy OR invade, destroy, rebuild. this is a very mild coup involvement for US standards. yet i get strawmanned with "what about IRAQ YOU MONSTER KIDS DIED" constantly in this thread. i'm not pro iraq war, im not pro US imperialism, im just stating the facts as i see them.

if i had to define THE CATALYST it's Yanukovyc abruptly ending EU trade talks. not the slightly better prepared protesters who rose up as a result. honestly the contrast between Russian business ties vs US/EU business ties is so stark that we wouldnt even need to pay oligarchs in cash, just say "yes we'll do business with you".

but lets say Yanukovyc tears up the trade talks, AND the us didnt pay to train protesters, does the coup still happen in your opinion? that's a KEY question.


Just to reinforce my point -

Georgia wanted to bring in a law (which exists in America) which states that any company in Georgia needs to declare, where 20% of the company is owned by a foreign investor (state or otherwise). The US (and the EU) were vehemently opposed to this, and it is my contention that the US organized mass protests in Georgia, which culminated in the law being removed. For Georgia, long term, this means trouble. When you apply that to Ukraine, then I could just as easily argue that they used "Yanukovyc abruptly ending EU trade talks" as a foil to generate the mass protests. And therefore, it could have been anything but this was convenient, so they went with it.

This is my own personal opinion. Understand as well that Ukraine is quite different from Georgia as the US has been far more active there, and therefore more people were already swayed to look westwards (ergo, easier). There are alot of very interesting Georgian comments relating to Ukraine on line. well worth viewing for context.

This post was edited by ferdia on Jul 11 2023 01:11pm
Member
Posts: 4,145
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 4.91
Warn: 20%
Jul 11 2023 01:18pm
Quote (ferdia @ Jul 11 2023 03:05pm)
it is far easier to point to his other post. Anyway here is my view of the post:

1. so far in line with what ive seen, bit of cash to train protesters how to protest. <<-- clearly more then this, but if this is the least, then the fact remains that the US government was complicit in the coup, which undermines the notion of "the people rising up against tyranny".

2. my overarching contention is that Western economic ties are a valuable resource, <<-- completely agree
3. and some number of people in Ukraine have desired to tie more strongly with the EU for a long time and move away from Russian influence. << -- completely agree
4. it's dollar and cents. <<-- completely agree
5. so while we did stoke that fire in 2004,(2014?) the fire was already lit. It's been lit since the moment the Berlin wall fell. <<-- this supports the notion that converting Ukraine to the west was a long term goal, in my opinion.
6. Russia isn't a backwater 3rd world nation, but they can't provide the same level of prosperity as EU and the US. <<-- completely agree (note: the expressing "3rd world" is a redundant expression which should no longer be used).
7. but this whole situation stands in stark contrast to a situation like Iraq. where the pro-US/Western narrative was non-existent in the country. <<-- completely agree
8. ...and still is for that matter. same with Afghanistan. it's a reason why the nation building projects we've attempted in the Middle east have been an abject failure. << -- completely agree
9. ...there was no fire started, we started it with bombs, then tried to be heroes for putting it out. it doesnt work. << -- completely agree
10. we've world built in asia, south/central america, eastern europe, and africa. all places where just a sprinkle of promise of western economic prosperity is most of the battle, <<-- you send "aid to these countries. Its aid which is not "free".
11. and i'd say Ukraine was far closer to that than iraq. <<-- completely agree
12. thus why i contend we weren't strictly instrumental to the coup, but rather a catalyst. << -- I would contend the US was THE catalyst, noting there is ample evidence to support that this is the US modus operandi. There is no murmur of other countries (other then the US and Russia) playing tug of war with the governance of Ukraine.

^thesnipa I guess i should have tagged you here. anyway, we are where we are. If you believe that the US was not complicit or instrumental with what has happened, and where we are, that is your opinion. We don't have to agree.


1. "Train protesters how to protest" phrasing it like this is dishonest or ignorant, pumping millions or billions into a very poor and corrupt country with the express purpose of creating resentment towards the nuclear super power next door is a bit more than training protesters how to protest. This sort of thing also doesn't happen by accident, nor does it happen overnight, to think the US just took advantage of a completely natural situation is the height of naivety.

2. The sun is hot.

3. The sun is hot.

4.?

5. The sun is hot.

6. The sun is hot.

7. Pro US as in beneficial for the US or Pro US in the sense that there were factions in the country that wanted the US to get involved? Either way this is incorrect.

8. Failure in what sense? They dominated the middle east for decades through force or economic influence, was anyone under the impression the US wanted to build California part 2 out in the dunes? Their purpose there was extending US dollar hegemony and limiting Chinas access to energy, which they managed for quite awhile and probably still do to some extent.

9. It was started by stoking public fury and fear enough for the American people to demand action, as per usual.

10. If a country agrees to be a vassal state and allows its natural and human resources to be plundered by the US then yes, they don't get bombed into the stone age, how generous. If I point a gun at you and say give me your wallet, there is a good chance you would give me your wallet, that doesn't make it a voluntary action lol.

11. Yeah how many dead in Ukraine vs Iraq? Not nearly as bad yet, give it time though they are trying their best to get those numbers up.

12. I think this is a stupid contention.

That is my view, not very productive which is why I didn't share it initially but if you want to know why I was dismissive this is it.

Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jul 11 2023 01:19pm
Quote (Djunior @ 11 Jul 2023 21:07)
It's completely clear that my point is that presidents can take controversial decisions, in no way shape or form am I comparing the pension reforms to Euromaidan.
My god your reading comprehension :wacko:


Nah, pension reform -was- in Macron's program and it -was- already in voting process in 2020 (Covid suspended it). While Yanukovich deliberately lied about joining EU to get elected.
It's wasn't just a "controversial decisions" it was a blatant scam lol
Member
Posts: 91,169
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Jul 11 2023 01:21pm
Quote (ferdia @ Jul 11 2023 01:30pm)
i agree that Yanukovyc abruptly ending EU trade talks was a tipping point, but understand, as we look at Georgia, the protests there were created by US forces. So while I can completely agree with you that there were masses of people in Ukraine that ever leaned westwards, it is my contention that the US was instrumental with the uprising, noting, again, this was straight out of the proverbial US playbook which they are using currently, in Georgia.

US politicians had no business being in Ukraine in 2014, stoking the masses. Its like Brexit, if you tell the masses something over and over, and say that everything will be great after something is changed/removed, when YOU KNOW that this is going to cause serious problems, you are not blameless when all hell breaks loose.

re: but lets say Yanukovyc tears up the trade talks, AND the us didnt pay to train protesters, does the coup still happen in your opinion? that's a KEY question. <<-- I dont see this as the key question. Ultimately the US was complicit and therefore we dont need to play guessing games of What If They Were Not Complicit.


1. why doesnt the US have any business being in Ukraine in 2014?

the obvious answer is "that's russian territory" in terms of NATO creep arguments Putin makes. give me a break, its a sovereign nation. it was being run as a proxy for Russia by their guy. its not Moscow, it's Kyiv. do i personally support the US being there and stoking tensions? no. is it hallowed ground we should never step foot on? not even close. some solid minority % of the population desires closer ties with the west, its not a no-go for politicians to go there and lobby for that. funding protesters is dirty pool, openly lobbying for trade talks isn't.

2. it IS the key question.

we shot the dying man. whether the man was all but dead already OR whether he could have been saved at a hospital is the central question to just how instrumental we were. i know we shot, you know we shot, i think he was dead either way, you dont want to explore that. its not a miles deep what if, its in fact my entire point in this thread. did the US turn the tides, or ride the wave?

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jul 11 2023 01:22pm
Member
Posts: 14,755
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 100,701.50
Jul 11 2023 01:25pm
Quote (Meanwhile @ Jul 11 2023 09:19pm)
Nah, pension reform -was- in Macron's program and it -was- already in voting process in 2020 (Covid suspended it). While Yanukovich deliberately lied about joining EU to get elected.
It's wasn't just a "controversial decisions" it was a blatant scam lol


Again you completely fail to get the point...

Presidents can take controversial decisions even when parliament does NOT agree with that

As in the case of pension reforms -->Macron bypassed parliament voting on this because he knew it had a big chance to fail

The point is that presidents can take such a decision
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1314931503151315231534529Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll