Quote (ferdia @ Jul 11 2023 03:05pm)
it is far easier to point to his other post. Anyway here is my view of the post:
1. so far in line with what ive seen, bit of cash to train protesters how to protest. <<-- clearly more then this, but if this is the least, then the fact remains that the US government was complicit in the coup, which undermines the notion of "the people rising up against tyranny".
2. my overarching contention is that Western economic ties are a valuable resource, <<-- completely agree
3. and some number of people in Ukraine have desired to tie more strongly with the EU for a long time and move away from Russian influence. << -- completely agree
4. it's dollar and cents. <<-- completely agree
5. so while we did stoke that fire in 2004,(2014?) the fire was already lit. It's been lit since the moment the Berlin wall fell. <<-- this supports the notion that converting Ukraine to the west was a long term goal, in my opinion.
6. Russia isn't a backwater 3rd world nation, but they can't provide the same level of prosperity as EU and the US. <<-- completely agree (note: the expressing "3rd world" is a redundant expression which should no longer be used).
7. but this whole situation stands in stark contrast to a situation like Iraq. where the pro-US/Western narrative was non-existent in the country. <<-- completely agree
8. ...and still is for that matter. same with Afghanistan. it's a reason why the nation building projects we've attempted in the Middle east have been an abject failure. << -- completely agree
9. ...there was no fire started, we started it with bombs, then tried to be heroes for putting it out. it doesnt work. << -- completely agree
10. we've world built in asia, south/central america, eastern europe, and africa. all places where just a sprinkle of promise of western economic prosperity is most of the battle, <<-- you send "aid to these countries. Its aid which is not "free".
11. and i'd say Ukraine was far closer to that than iraq. <<-- completely agree
12. thus why i contend we weren't strictly instrumental to the coup, but rather a catalyst. << -- I would contend the US was THE catalyst, noting there is ample evidence to support that this is the US modus operandi. There is no murmur of other countries (other then the US and Russia) playing tug of war with the governance of Ukraine.
^thesnipa I guess i should have tagged you here. anyway, we are where we are. If you believe that the US was not complicit or instrumental with what has happened, and where we are, that is your opinion. We don't have to agree.
1. "Train protesters how to protest" phrasing it like this is dishonest or ignorant, pumping millions or billions into a very poor and corrupt country with the express purpose of creating resentment towards the nuclear super power next door is a bit more than training protesters how to protest. This sort of thing also doesn't happen by accident, nor does it happen overnight, to think the US just took advantage of a completely natural situation is the height of naivety.
2. The sun is hot.
3. The sun is hot.
4.?
5. The sun is hot.
6. The sun is hot.
7. Pro US as in beneficial for the US or Pro US in the sense that there were factions in the country that wanted the US to get involved? Either way this is incorrect.
8. Failure in what sense? They dominated the middle east for decades through force or economic influence, was anyone under the impression the US wanted to build California part 2 out in the dunes? Their purpose there was extending US dollar hegemony and limiting Chinas access to energy, which they managed for quite awhile and probably still do to some extent.
9. It was started by stoking public fury and fear enough for the American people to demand action, as per usual.
10. If a country agrees to be a vassal state and allows its natural and human resources to be plundered by the US then yes, they don't get bombed into the stone age, how generous. If I point a gun at you and say give me your wallet, there is a good chance you would give me your wallet, that doesn't make it a voluntary action lol.
11. Yeah how many dead in Ukraine vs Iraq? Not nearly as bad yet, give it time though they are trying their best to get those numbers up.
12. I think this is a stupid contention.
That is my view, not very productive which is why I didn't share it initially but if you want to know why I was dismissive this is it.