d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev13133143153163174527Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 4,591
Joined: Jan 30 2021
Gold: 751.50
Apr 3 2022 08:33am
https://twitter.com/backtolife_2022/status/1510231709131984907?t=M1agmP6QcvWAf3hbQAyw9Q&s=19

no more long showers, take that putin! :rofl:

Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Apr 3 2022 04:26pm)
SeemsRussian army is made of looters, rapists, and mass murderers. The war crimes are confirmed by journalists in my super trusted paper, video, photos, it's official, it's not propaganda.
In the streets, hundreds of civilians loosely murdered. Bullets in the neck.

I don't think it's possible anymore to stretch on Iraq excuse or whatever Azov excuse. Russians must pay the hardest price for that.


not suprising since it was also mostly russian troops that committed the largest mass rape in history

Member
Posts: 33,699
Joined: May 9 2009
Gold: 3.33
Apr 3 2022 09:00am
Georgian and Azerbaijani soldiers burning the Russian flag at Hostomel airport, following the Russian retreat

https://twitter.com/Caucasuswar/status/1510630269761507331
Member
Posts: 52,469
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Apr 3 2022 09:05am
Quote (Sioux @ 3 Apr 2022 06:04)
Maybe in Europe but American reporting made it seem pretty likely Putin was going to invade in the month building up.


Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ 3 Apr 2022 07:57)
Yeah, American intelligence was pretty clear for like a month ahead of time that invasion was imminent.

"Ha, you trust American intelligence?"

Yeah, when they're telling me something literally nobody wants to happen is gonna happen.



Can you really blame us Euros distrusting the infos of American intelligence after the past 25 years? Particularly when the consequence of these insights is a policy decision (cancelling Nord Stream 2) which was in America's economic interest (selling us their shitty, expensive, ecologically damaging LNG gas) and which the American side had been demanding for years, long before any Russian troop build-up had begun. At the time, these claims by the CIA et al. looked all too convenient.
Member
Posts: 14,752
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 100,701.50
Apr 3 2022 09:18am
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Apr 3 2022 04:26pm)
Seems Russian army is made of looters, rapists, and mass murderers. The war crimes are confirmed by journalists in my super trusted paper, videos, photos, it's official, it's not propaganda.
In the streets, hundreds of civilians loosely murdered. Bullets in the neck.

I don't think it's possible anymore to stretch on Iraq excuse or whatever Azov excuse. Russians must pay the hardest price for that.


1) It's a dirty war and both sides have committed war crimes. Of course people like you will deny that or are incapable of seeing both sides of the story.

2) I asked google about Iraqi civilians killed and the answer is several hundred thousands https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/costs/human/civilians/iraqi

So you might want to reconsider your statement.

Member
Posts: 52,469
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Apr 3 2022 09:19am
Quote (Goomshill @ 3 Apr 2022 11:18)
I'd still really like to know what's actually going on in Ukraine. Because it still doesn't make much sense
Other people doubted the warnings of invasion based on some thought of sanctions pressure or oligarchs holding sway or whatever. It seemed to me the biggest part of the calculation would be the question- why? What does Putin stand to gain? Most of Ukraine's natural resources and productive farmland are already in the separatist regions under Russia's sphere, whereas West Ukraine is mostly a true shithole, the poorest region of the poorest country in Europe. Was there some real goal in mind that could only be accomplished taking the whole country instead of the just the best cut of it? Then even when Russia did invade, they encircled major cities and basically stalled out. So at that point and on, we know Kiev was threatened but never actually being flattened. Lets not pretend otherwise, Russia clearly has the conventional weapons power to wipe out a city like Kiev. The allies had far lesser technology in WW2 and look at the bombings of Dresden, Tokyo, Hamburg, etc. If the goal was to massacre everyone, they easily could. But instead we see Kiev is intact enough it still has all major infrastructure and utilities functional. Water, gas, electricity, internet, etc. But we also saw the siege and bombardment of Mariupol, far harsher. So the presumption there was that Russia was making an example of one city, chosen for its far-right contingent, and use that to convince other cities to surrender or face the same fate. But then Russia withdrew from Kiev. So clearly, that's not the case. And its not like Putin is some humanitarian afraid of killing innocent people, look to the atrocities we see in the wake of the Russian withdrawal from Irpin, the slaughter there. And yet, for everything that's happened, the gas is still flowing through Ukraine, from Russia to the EU. The pipelines haven't been shut down or attacked. The Ukrainians are still permitting it. Why? Nord Stream II has been frozen and abandoned, but Russian gas still flows. For all the geopolitical manuevering to literally go around ukraine's transit leverage, that's seen no action so far this war.


It all makes perfect sense if you ask me.

The strategic minimum goal was to create a land connection between the separatist regions in Donbass and Crimea and to seize control over the north Crimean water channel so the Ukrainians can't cut off the peninsula's water supply. Therefore, Mariupol had to be captured whatever it takes, even if it means bombing the city into the ground. That Mariupol was a stronghold of an actual nazi battalion only made the decision to approach this partiuclar city with utmost force easier.


With regard to other big cities, flattening them made no sense. Bombing Kyiv, Kharkiv or other Ukrainian cities into the ground would only produce downside risks for Russia: in case Russia conquers these places, it would amount to a destruction of assets. In any case, it would risk even harsher sanctions, NATO or UN troops intervening in the conflict, creating a destablized and impoverished shithole on Russia's doorstep, potentially creating a terrorist movement which retaliates in Russian cities, further isolating Russia on the international stage, prompting some holdouts like India to join the Western sanctions against Russia and so on.


The gas is still flowing because Putin needs the revenue from the sales just as much as Germany, Italy and other European countries need the gas. There exist no gas pipelines to China* or India with which Putin could replace Western Europe as the customer of his gas. Without the foreign currency he earns from these sales, the Russian state would default within months and the ruble would enter hyperinflation within 1-2 years. I've repeatedly called cutting off gas shipments to Europe the "economic equivalent of the nuclear option" for good reason, the principle of MAD also applies here.







* the existing pipelines from Russia to China have a much lower capacity than those to Europe, also, the European and the Chinese gas pipelines are served by different Russian gas fields. It would take thousands of miles of new intra-Russian pipelines to allow the fields which served Europe so far to even be connected to the pipeline network with China.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Apr 3 2022 09:21am
Member
Posts: 52,469
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Apr 3 2022 09:26am
Quote (JohnnyMcCoy @ 3 Apr 2022 12:16)
and it is indeed very weird that ukraine demands an energy embargo, but meanwhile its flowing through their country with no problem

they could easily shut that down and then blame russia



That would be a far too big risk for Ukraine. Their literal existence hinges on continued Western support. If the West found out that they were the ones who shut down the pipelines in an attempt at blackmailing their own allies, then public and also official support for Ukraine in Western Europe would plummet like crazy. They would be completely and utterly fucked.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Apr 3 2022 09:32am
Quote (Djunior @ 3 Apr 2022 15:18)
1) It's a dirty war and both sides have committed war crimes. Of course people like you will deny that or are incapable of seeing both sides of the story.

2) I asked google about Iraqi civilians killed and the answer is several hundred thousands https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/costs/human/civilians/iraqi

So you might want to reconsider your statement.


Russian agression you defended all along since the begining.
Trump supporter became a rapist & mass murder supporter, such a genius !
Member
Posts: 14,752
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 100,701.50
Apr 3 2022 09:41am
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Apr 3 2022 05:32pm)
Russian agression you defended all along since the begining.
Trump supporter became a rapist & mass murder supporter, such a genius !


What a piece of shit reply but no surprises here.

I didn't defend anyone. Read my post for once.
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Apr 3 2022 09:41am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Apr 3 2022 10:05am)
Can you really blame us Euros distrusting the infos of American intelligence after the past 25 years? Particularly when the consequence of these insights is a policy decision (cancelling Nord Stream 2) which was in America's economic interest (selling us their shitty, expensive, ecologically damaging LNG gas) and which the American side had been demanding for years, long before any Russian troop build-up had begun. At the time, these claims by the CIA et al. looked all too convenient.


Except Biden approved Nord Stream 2.

Literally nobody wanted this war to happen. Not Americans and not Europeans. That's why I gave American intelligence credence here.
Member
Posts: 52,469
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,404.67
Apr 3 2022 09:52am
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ 3 Apr 2022 16:41)
Except Biden approved Nord Stream 2.

Literally nobody wanted this war to happen. Not Americans and not Europeans. That's why I gave American intelligence credence here.

Biden approved Nord Stream 2 out of diplomatic considerations. He (smartly and correctly) calculated that pissing off a key ally would be worse than pissing off the hardliners in Congress.

The U.S. had a strong economic interest in Nord Stream 2 being cancelled, irrespective of the war. They wanted to increase the market share of their LNG in Europe, plain and simple. This is easily proven by the fact that the U.S. had been trying to stop Nord Stream 2 for years, long before the threat of a Russian invasion in Ukraine became concrete.

So while nobody wanted this war to happen, the American side had a strong incentive to exaggerate the seriousness of the situation to cause the Europeans to panic, cancel the pipeline and reorient their gas supply toward the more expensive American LNG. And therefore, I stand by my assessment that the European side had good reason to distrust the infos of U.S. intelligence.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev13133143153163174527Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll