Parroting leftist/BLM talking points and catch phrases that could be found on a teenage socialist's blog is not the sole libertarian position or even a good libertarian position.
A better one is supporting police reform (or more radical libertarian solutions) while simultaneously condemning the leftist riots that target and victimize innocent people and violate property rights.
You think that guy in your sig supports leftist riots and chants 'no justice no peace'? No way.
'The marginalized community' didn't tell anyone shit.
Various
individuals said an array of different things, ranging from police reform to marxism and everything in between.
Defund the police w/o private replacements to let rioters and other criminals roam free, fraudulent racism narratives, and ending the nuclear family.
The idea that the request from the leftist mobs are clear, concise, uniform and valid and that people just aren't listening to their supposedly just demands is ridiculous, as is the idea that it would make rioting justified.
Some random guy or a random business isn't guilty of a police shooting. They aren't the government or the police.
Its immoral and against the core of libertarianism to target innocent people and their property, even if you think you have a justified problem with police.
Code
The non-aggression principle is an ethical stance which asserts that "aggression" is inherently illegitimate. "Aggression" is defined as the "initiation" of physical force against persons or property, the threat of such, or fraud upon persons or their property.
Its easy to identify the phony leftist core of the rioting. Fake and omnipresent racism claims and the pursuit of the abolition of capitalism are prominent themes.
Reforming qualified immunity isn't going to stop Marxist riots and to think otherwise is very naïve.This isn't some intellectual justice movement.
Time and again violent criminals are glorified and the details are pushed under the rug and ignored to push false narratives.
i mean, i dont get why people take the bait of thinking "defund police" = get rid of police entirely.
its been said time and again that the movement is about demilitarizing police, and even suggested armored vehicle funding and the like could instead be spent on training for officers to de-escalate situations with non-lethal force.
but instead the few idiots who are literally calling for no police at all are focused on, this would be like calling wannabe 14 year old libertarians who just like the idea of no taxes the face of the party.