more revisionist history concerning conflicts that russian unmarked troops started in foreign territory to create excuses for and invasion, occupation, and subsequent ethnic cleansing. why am i not surprised that you support that? oh right...

still doesn't explain away the overwhelming rejection of russian invaders, not even in your #alternative facts world...

Send them back!

https://m.focus.de/politik/ausland/ukraine-krise/der-aufstand-wirkt-inszeniert-alles-nur-ein-riesen-bluff-experten-bringen-gewagte-theorie-ins-spie_id_197379436.html

i feel generous today so i will give your lazy ass this one little bone

you will dismiss it anyway in 3....2....1....go



there are literally clips from german government tv all over place from a few years back that heavily criticise the ukranian government (most well known one from a dude called restle or so) for bombing civilians in eastern ukraine

if anyone is rewriting history its you and your masters, who eradicated all pre invasion history

i guess they were all kremlin bots back then

and now you can spam me again with another copy paste war apologist pooootin boot licker kremlin bot propaganda bla comment

go ahead buddy, but the facts dont care about your feelings

Good rule for life

well said.

Adress of Putin and Lukashenko to nation in 5 minutes

in the end its like yuri bezmenov said, even when these people look at the proof how the media completely flipped their narrative, they just refuse to believe it

it is what it is i guess

only in revisionist kremlin bot history are "unmarked russian troops instigated a regional conflict in order to fabricate a casus belli - like they have done many times, including in ukraine itself, before" and "ukrainian troops shell civilians and are criticised by western media" somehow mutually exclusive, even though they are directly linked, and the latter happened as a result of the former.

does that make shelling of civilians ok? of course NOT. were they rightfully criticised? absolutely. has this been blown completely out of proportion by kremlin propaganda, and uncritically accepted by useful idiots: yes, the likes of you, ferdia, junior... are the perfect example for that.
not that even your favourite excuse, a completely 'unprovoked, random shelling of civilians, just for fun' would remotely justify the russian invasion, resulting in infinitely more casualties, destruction, and crimes...


regarding your "just a front for troop movement" copium: in case you didn't know, russia already had troops in belarus for literally years. an attack from the north has been an option (and initially happened, guess you already forgot) since the start. and no, two generals warning about the POSSIBILITY of an attack from that angle does not confirm your copium, completely disregarding all the downsides for pootin this resulted in (which you predictably did not address once)...

also, could there be a more obvious way to move troops than to draw the whole world's attention to where exactly prigoshin and his mercenaries are? that only makes sense in your kremlin bot world, where "the west" is suddenly completely unconcerned with them and celebrates them as heroes, which of course never happened in reality...

This post was edited by fender on Jun 26 2023 01:22pm

And nothing special

sadge