Racism. Resident vatniks is more suitable.

which % of russian population ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruscism

About 15% without 12 hundreths

ohhhh

"This is the only the beginning. I believe that we have not seen the real counteroffensive. It will be in the future. What we see now, and I have some military experience, would be called shaping."

https://www.svoboda.org/a/prezident-chehii-ukraina-rossia/32460323.html

so, fake news ?

so you think the 15% who are doing good because of the regime, meaning the 15% who have the power.

big problem, any idea to fix it ? how about the oligarchy repair kit ?

GL

It's obvious. Losing A4s, demining machines and personnel carriers doesn't mean that the main strike was already made.

thats what the world IF is for



its called geopolitics fenderp, are you still ignorant to this?

it has the exact same reason why the US almost started WW3 over cuba, why they invade syria to steal their oil, why turkey invaded syria and cyprus (peaceful NATO members)

its why russia does what it does, its why china is making the moves they make

in their own papers from the wikileaks US authorities state that russias geopolitics will cause them to go to war over georgia and ukraine so they cant join NATO aaaand it happened

which means they knew exactly what would happen and pushed ukraine into the western block anyway

last time before you vanished (usually when i make too much sense) i clearly told you that only one man is responsible for giving the order, but multiple parties are responsible for the escalation

its fucked up, but its the world we live in, how is that so hard to understand? i consistently speak out against the warmongering on ANY side

If your grandmother had wheels she'd be a bike.

you're dodging the question, ampootin. what exactly would have happened to russia had they not invaded ukraine and started killing tens of thousands of innocent ukrainians as well as their own youth and future? why was simply NOT going to war not an alternative?

do you just not know what "inevitable" means? "geopolitics" is not a casus belli, it's a pathetic attempt of an excuse by people who fundamentally don't understand what it means. the US invading iraq was not "inevitable". 9/11 was not "inevitable". you can find motivations and explanations for why those things happened, and you can agree or disagree with them, but to call something "inevitable" is just a trying to make excuses for those responsible - people with a lot of power making life and death decision.

really silly excuses, ampootin. imagine constantly trying to justify the warmongering of a murderous dictator. disgusting...