Quote (Thor123422 @ Aug 25 2020 09:58pm)
Except in this case it was a person who was still alive, and could have sought help if he hadn't been restrained until he died. There was "actual harm" that can be argued to be the cause of his death, both through the physical damage caused by the restraint and the active prevention of getting aid.
except that the medical examiner also laid out how there's no evidence of physical damage, and they promptly called EMTs for someone who was incapable of getting his own aid.
If this wasn't some cultural moment by happenstance, and the calculations weren't political, this wouldn't even be up for consideration.