Quote (Goomshill @ Jun 24 2022 10:34pm)
Before the election, Project Veritas received a copy of Ashley Biden's journal from someone who had rented a property she left it at. Rather than post it to the internet, they first verified its authenticity by checking with Ashley Biden, then decided not to publish it, both figuring it wasn't newsworthy and that it might actually help Biden by backfiring and stirring up sympathy. But we did learn it was real. After the election, Merrick Garland ordered an FBI raid of Project Veritas where they broke into the journalists home in the middle of the night with battering rams and automatic weapons, and seized all their electronic devices. The FBI tipped off the New York Times, who PV were in a lawsuit against. The FBI then immediately- same night- leaked all the emails and confidential sources to the NYT, including attorney-client communications in their lawsuit against the NYT. There was no accusation of a real crime. They initially claimed it was 'receiving stolen property', like a journalist receiving a leak is a criminal that needs to be raided at the risk of being shot
Thats just the tip of Merrick Garlands iceberg. He raided economist Peter Navarro's home. He raided another Trump lawyer last week. Its not a joke when I'm predicting he'll raid the home of Clarence and Ginni Thomas, I give it 20%+ odds
I have no idea what that is.
Navarro and Clark are obviously involved in the plot to steal the election. In America, plotting and executing a coup on the incoming administration isn't legitimate political activity, and they may have violated laws, so investigations by the Justice Department are an example of our system working.
Your talking points are just a replay of the major scandals under Trump, whether it's Russiagate, Ukraine, or whatever. Wrongdoing happens, laws may have been violated, institutions like the DOJ, Inspector Generals, and Congress investigate, and the Trump-world spin is that those institutions are actually the corrupt ones. Reality gets flipped on it's head.
The wife of a Supreme Court justice communicating her support for the coup on the incoming administration, while her husband was in a position to potentially influence an electoral outcome if one of the cases ever made it that far, is a big deal. That's the scandal, not the Justice Department looking into it.