"
So you're saying the reason businesses such as grocery stores can't kick out people based on ethnicity and gender ISN'T the civil rights act? This is news to literally every legal professional and scholar in the US. Care to elaborate?"

(ya I will elaborate. since i never said no such thing its another straw man you just lack basic reasoning when debating a topic. it gets tiresome to have to continually correct you then you ignore it and continue on in the same basic fallacies.)

the tiffany dover story just keeps getting stranger


The Tiffany Dover Effect" - Dead, Alive, What's the Deal?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/76V0jVU5KxYH/

Addone literally told you the Act that sets a higher standard of requirement for grocery stores to refuse service. You argued, accused of "red herrings and strawmans" yet failed to show any such fallacy. It's like you've just enrolled in your first persuasive writing course, and believe that shouting out the names of fallacies will win you a debate. That's not how it works, kiddo.

ive seen some fact checkers saying how shes doing well

which doesnt really do the job because she stopped posting or appearing ANYWHERE, i mean if people thought i died by the vaccine and i wanted them to feel calmer, i would probably make some kind of appearance to let everyone know im doing fine this is very weird! she poofed like a duped rune in d2 and that doesnt make any sense

i dont really know or even have a belief about any of it. Some also say she is a crisis actor just people used to make a story for the fake news people. could be her name isnt even tiffany dover.

No good person ever uttered the words "Crisis Actor".

That is like saying "race card".

This post was edited by Skinned on Dec 22 2020 09:00am

You're on a role. Crisis actor is not only not a bad word, it's an actual necessary training position.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crisis_actor

If you are referring to crisis actors being used to fake events, as with most things, without evidence, such claims aren't meaningful.

Considering the use of crisis actors to fake events like sandy hook has never been substantiated id say calling it bullshit is very meaningful.

Deplorables gonna be deplorable lol.

"Addone literally told you the Act that sets a higher standard of requirement for grocery stores to refuse service."
(alot of things were said but i never seen an example of "refuse service/grocery store)

you said: " You argued, accused of "red herrings and strawmans" yet failed to show any such fallacy."
(i point them out through out the conversation)

you said: "It's like you've just enrolled in your first persuasive writing course,"
(its more like your clueless what a logical fallacy is)

you said: "The other shit is just nonsense. There's zero correlation between activists targeting brands over faces on boxes and vaccination priorities."
(isnt it kind of racist to demand a race gets removed from advertising? I bet its only white people doing it.)(not to mention? do you really believe the "shot" is safe? I dont. Could it be that I am warning people? that I am actually concerned and suspicious that the old rich white dudes in power wana get them "non-whites the shot first?) I dont want the shot put me last on the list ty. Do you see my point now? do you twist things up on purpose or is it a comprehension problem?

although I am wasting my time I have time to waste
you said: "So you're saying the reason businesses such as grocery stores can't kick out people based on ethnicity and gender ISN'T the civil rights act? This is news to literally every legal professional and scholar in the US. Care to elaborate?"
(that is a actual bonafide straw man you making up things and saying thats what i said then you tear it down.)

you said: "You also got butthurt at addone over a discussion that he was not part of. This is not rational behavior."
(that is just you in your imaginary -ville looking for and making up arguments)(its straw manning, it doesnt matter if you realize it or not)

and lets revisit this
you said: "Probably best not to get upset at addone over discussions you had with me that he wasn't party to. What he said was accurate, and he wasn't dogging you at all. Relax, friend. :)"
"...discussions you had with me that he wasn't party to...." (so here is an admission he was not up to speed on the conversation?)
"...What he said was accurate,..." (but now here he is up to speed on the conversation.)
"...Relax, friend. :)...." (you can dispense of the jive, I know the little jabs might make you feel better but they only tell me your insincere.)
-------------------------------------

What was the argument that I conceded. "that grocery store could at a whim decide to not allow a person in the store for any reason except what is stated by law." But I find it important to add that it was not by your arguments but by my own opening research. your argumentation can be horrendous.