Quote (ofthevoid @ Apr 27 2021 01:51pm)
It's like we live in dual realities.
One party is saying spend 600b another 2T this is the modern reality I see.
Fiscal conservatism = low taxes, low spending. Both of these are consistent with what we've seen in the last couple of years.
Fiscal conservatism may want to achieve a balanced budget by lowering both those things but that's not the central goal.
If that was the central goal we can have 80% taxes with matched spending and end up with a balanced budget but that would be literally the antithesis of what fiscal conservatism is trying to do.
Fiscal conservativism before ever increasing social programs was one thing and included balanced budgets, "fiscal conservativism" in the modern era is a different thing. when republicans try to harken on the old era to gain votes in the modern era this messaging is disingenuous. go ahead and ask a republican about why their budget isn't balanced, you'll get pure whataboutism in line with what you're saying, not an actual admission they have changed, just projection.
this is all unarguable reality, and what im saying, plain and simple. i didnt say both sides are equally bad, although its true that lower taxes make up for a significant portion of the spending gap republicans want to be the focus. im saying both are bad, neither is responsible.
the idea that we cant possibly get back to a balanced budget, even with social programs, is a lie perpetuated by both sides to sell their voters false promises. neither is interested in even trying.