I don't get emails from Trump. Spam or otherwise.
I just saw it on Reuters.

I'm wondering why you would assume I do get emails from Trump.

Does your video include this part where a democrat smash the shit out of this Jim Jordan ?



It's so easy to act like an idiot or to destroy things.

Damn he got shot down quick Lmao.

Going to blow up in the Dems faces, esp. if the Senate calls on Hunter Biden to testify down the road if it gets to that place.

Impeachment witnesses that have never even spoken to Trump? Lol.

Yeah, hearing word from a guy that heard from a guy that heard from a guy. Sounds legit.

This post was edited by GLYC123 on Nov 14 2019 05:37pm

Didn't the president himself get recorded doing this, and even openly admitted in his tweets ?
Yep the guy who "does not have time for hearings" but tweet 60 times in a day about it.

Not true. The transcript of the call is out there and it's really shown nothing.

The wording is,

“There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that, so whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great,” Trump said in the July 25 call, according to the memo. “Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution, so if you can look into it, It sounds horrible to me."

, and proposing this means Trump is withholding foreign aid for an investigation for political gain? Pretty weak argument.

This post was edited by GLYC123 on Nov 14 2019 05:52pm

Not true but not false ? Ok lol.

Lot of talks about something else ? Ok lol.


It's just over blatantly clear that trump did a quid pro quo. Thanks.

/nb: if you think William B. Taylor is not a good witness there's no need to follow up on the discussion.

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Nov 14 2019 06:04pm

I know a guy who knows a guy....

Bill Clinton giving Donald Trump impeachment advice
lmfao

Have you read the transcript?

also this:

please answer I want to laugh at you

Can someone explain to me how it is a legitimate, nay, sane situation to condemn the Dems for not having the whistle-blower on the stand, while at the exact same time asking your own employees to defy subpoenas for testifying in the exact same scenario?

Is there rational justification for this at all?




what to literally mean by 'blow up in the dems faces'?

you mean like after multiple testimony from respected non partisan confirming everything that some guy heard from a guy that is on an official Document that was released by the white house, you really think MORE people will think he shouldn't get impeached? Good luck with that theory.

This post was edited by Phaggot on Nov 14 2019 06:56pm