Quote (Goomshill @ 18 Aug 2017 05:11)
I tried :wallbash:
This is what's so crazy about the state of the political climate. He actually cares more whether Trump's story was technically incorrect than the fact Trump is talking about violating muslim burials. He can probably regurgitate 10 different defenses of why he feels antifa and white nationalists aren't comparable, but he probably has no clue whatsoever that Trump just revoked Executive Order 13690 or what that means.
haha, he offered you an easy out and you fully went for it...
i guess it's easier to talk about someone than argue against them. typical right wing mentality unfortunately...
Quote (fender @ 18 Aug 2017 04:47)
a shame, you almost made it through my whole comment. apparently you just missed the last sentence - or what do you think "the suggestion he's making by yet again perpetuating this debunked story" means?
and yes, i already know the hypocrisy doesn't bother you - the moment he made that comment we already knew that "i want to get all the facts first" was just a flimsy excuse, a hilariously ironic comment coming from him of all people, as his whole campaign and presidency are proof of the opposite. it really did not require his pershing comment to prove how serious he was about the truth. i just thought i point it out again because of the direct comparison between terrorism he's (rightfully) eager to condemn and terrorism he just condemns when he's basically forced to.
just wondering about the "false equivalency" part. wasn't it a major part of the trumpapologist's defense that there was no such thing in his 'all sides' and 'many many sides' statements that you defended tooth and nail? why treat my statements differently? at no point did i say the terrorist attacks were equally bad - so just like your cult leader, i made statements you should defend as something i "got right" if you're not a hypocrite. oh right, there's the problem...