Quote (Djunior @ 24 May 2023 20:29)
I'm pointing out the Ukrainian losses, read the posts if you didn't get that
You have sources for Ukrainian losses in bakhmut ? Because in such warfare it is the attacker who get the most casulaties, and it's going wild if there's no training, bad weapons etc...
Again:
-
what are your sources for Ukrainian losses in Bakhmut ?-
at least 20,000 wagner "mercenaries" died [ in Bakhmut ] (this is validated information and you know it)
Quote (Djunior @ 24 May 2023 20:28)
You didn't explain ANYTHING, let me explain it for you, lol
A country that has spent a huge percentage of it's GDP and resources on defense against NATO (I mean everything, from the cold war until now) is NOT going to accept your trash excuse "those countries wanted it, trololol". That's completely logical, the US wouldn't either, as you know ;)
It will never work like that. NATO should've understood that, it's insane that a professional military alliance uses such an excuse to keep encroaching on their adversary willingly threatening world peace.
Nato did a military attack on Ukraine, killing civilians, doing war crimes ? Ukraine was forced to join Nato ?