Quote (dro94 @ 25 Mar 2022 20:38)
I just don't agree. 200,000+ young Russians have fled the country because of sanctions and the growing totalitarianism brought by the war, many parts for weapons and vehicles will be imported and subject to sanctions, lead times are very long regardless
Quote (thesnipa @ 25 Mar 2022 20:42)
I dont get how people can see protests where a hundred people or so go in knowing they'll be jailed all over Russia every single day and think this is sustainable, we're still at the start of the conflict. its clearly taking a toll as are the economic sanctions. drawing conclusions a month into hyperinflation and lack of products available is too hasty.
The sanctions which are already in place are of course hurting the Russians like crazy. What I am arguing against, however, is this common conception that an oil and gas embargo (on top of the sanctions which are already in place) would quickly dry up Putin's warchest and make it financially impossible for him to continue this war. This notion is used by proponents of such an embargo to put moral pressure on those disagreeing with it and it imho just doesn't have a lot of merit.
The morale issues of Russian troops, problems replacing fallen soldiers with similarly trained ones, the discomfort with the war at the home front, the economic pain suffered by ordinary citizens, the inconvenience and loss of wealth felt by the oligarchs and elites - all these things mean that this war cannot be kept up indefinitely anyway. An embargo on top would not fundamentally change this situation, but come with gigantic repercussions for us in Europe.
Imho, the best course of action is clearly to stay the current course, find replacements for Russian oil and gas and tell Putin to go suck Xi's dick once we are done disentangling our supply from Russia.
Quote (dro94 @ 25 Mar 2022 21:21)
It's a big area, the JFO are entrenched and the Russians have been fighting on 3 axes of advance. If Russia concentrate their airpower, resupplying efforts; including troops from Kherson and Kharkiv, then it's hard not to imagine a scenario where the Donbas is taken by Russia
Also, when Mariupol falls there will be a lot of troops available to push North
I agree with this, but got to wonder... one week ago, I was making the argument that the fall of Mariupol would free up troops and increase the pressure on the Ukrainian forces in Donbass (and potentially Kharkiv). If my memory serves me right, it was you who pushed back against this take and said that Mariupol falling would only free up an insignificant amount of Russian forces and not change the situation in the east all that much. This is not meant as an attack btw, I'm just curious why you changed your mind.
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Mar 25 2022 03:20pm