Quote (Horford @ Sep 9 2018 11:23am)

why are you making fun of one of your idols?

"low information"

ironic coming from the guy who once tried to claim Russia didn't meddle in our election

Quote (IgoSoHard @ Sep 9 2018 12:45pm)

This is what I’m talking about.

Claiming I idolize someone I’ve never praised

Claiming I said stated something I’ve never said

You once tried to claim that “Russia had a significant impact on the 2016 election, & that they virtually swayed the whole thing, although you can’t prove it” so maybe ease up on claiming anybody else said something ridiculous

Quote (Horford @ 9 Sep 2018 14:03)

You've never said that explicity but youve said something along the same lines.

And i stand by that claim, comey + russia more than likely swung the election, though you can't obviously prove that.

Quote (excellence @ Sep 9 2018 02:16pm)

[URL=http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=76154721&f=119&p=535872204]http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=76154721&f=119&p=535872204[/URL]

>drumpf is 100% owned by russia who is on a 30-year campaign to hack the election.

this post of yours is from today. September 9 2018

Quote

President Trump is expected to declassify, as early as this week, documents covering the U.S. government's surveillance of Trump campaign adviser Carter Page and the investigative activities of senior Justice Department lawyer Bruce Ohr, according to allies of the president.

The big picture: Republicans on the House Intelligence and Judiciary committees believe the declassification will permanently taint the Trump-Russia investigation by showing the investigation was illegitimate to begin with. Trump has been hammering the same theme for months.


They allege that Bruce Ohr played an improper intermediary role between the Justice Department, British spy Christopher Steele and Fusion GPS — the opposition research firm that produced the Trump-Russia dossier, funded by Democrats. (Ohr's wife, Nellie, worked for Fusion GPS on Russia-related matters during the presidential election — a fact that Ohr did not disclose on federal forms.)
And they further allege that the Obama administration improperly spied on Carter Page — all to take down Trump.
House Freedom Caucus chairman Mark Meadows, who is close to Trump, told Axios earlier today: "After two years of investigations and accusations from both sides of the aisle about what documents indicate, it is past time for documents to be declassified and let the American people decide for themselves if DoJ and FBI acted properly."

The bottom line: President Trump has been hyping, and congressional Republicans have been calling for, the declassification of these documents. It's now put up or shut up time. We should find out very soon whether these documents are as explosive as advertised.

https://www.axios.com/trump-declassify-carter-page-bruce-ohr-documents-307ff599-df29-49db-ae01-a8b027908b12.html

Quote (IceMage @ Sep 9 2018 07:52pm)

Another attempt by Trump to muddy the waters, because he knows his supporters aren't capable of critically thinking about whatever is contained in those documents.

Quote

In a court filing Friday, the government admitted it misunderstood a series of text messages between Butina and another individual, as well as other information about their relationship.

Though Chutkan commended the government for walking back what she called salacious allegations, she said she didn’t understand how the government made the error in the first place.

Chutkan said it only took five seconds to realize that the messages were jokes when she reviewed them.

“It was apparent on their face,” she said.

Quote (Goomshill @ Sep 10 2018 03:20pm)

[URL=http://thehill.com/regulation/405924-judge-orders-alleged-russian-agent-to-remain-in-jail]http://thehill.com/regulation/405924-judge-orders-alleged-russian-agent-to-remain-in-jail[/URL]



Shouldn't it set off some red flags and raise alarms to those placing their trust in authorities that prosecutors were making salacious, slanderous allegations against the alleged russian agent that a judge could identify were false in 5 seconds of looking at the texts? If a judge is saying that a reasonable person could figure out that the texts don't support calling her a whore, but the prosecutors publicly said that anyway, then how can it be explained other than malicious prosecutors? And of course, there's something obvious missing when the judge admonishes the defense for potentially poisoning future jurors by detailing evidence to the media but doesn't take the same slap at the prosecutors for literally calling the accused a whore on a national stage

Quote (IceMage @ Sep 9 2018 07:52pm)

Another attempt by Trump to muddy the waters, because he knows his supporters aren't capable of critically thinking about whatever is contained in those documents.