Quote (Hamsterbaby @ 21 May 2023 10:40)
^malopox, ^ferdia
You know something funny?
I was listening to my Taiwan daily news and political talk show, they mentioned that the Polish President and government are quietly asking Zelensky to start peace talks and to negotiate. :lol:
Not sure how true that is, any of you guys heard any news in Europe ?
Quote (Djunior @ 21 May 2023 10:45)
Douglas Macgregor has said several times that support for Ukraine is waning and that even the Poles are starting to scratch their heads seeing that Russia is not that gas station they thought it to be.
Support for this war is waning everywhere, the key question is at which pace. If, for example, public support went from 72% to 69% over the span of 4 months, thzat would be largely irrelevant. If it went from 72% to 55% over the same timespan, it would be alarming.
Anyway, from what I can tell, the Poles are pretty gung-ho about fighting and resisting Russia. There's probably no place in all of Europe that's more anti-Russia than Poland. So while it could well be true that support for Ukraine is waning even in Poland, I'm very confident that they'd be among the last ones to give up on this war.
Quote (ofthevoid @ 21 May 2023 04:22)
People are still thinking in the wrong terms of how Russia is approaching this war. The goal is not to capture as much territory as fast as possible. The goal has been evident for awhile now which is to exhaust and grind the enemy down. It's a slow burn and Russia is betting it can outlast western support for Ukraine.
That's a risky bet though. Russia's economy is tiny compared to NATO-and-friends and highly dependent on global commodity prices. As an illustrative example, say that to keep up the current war efforts, Russia has to expend 10% of its GDP while the West only has to expend 1% or so for its support of Ukraine - at this rate, it would not be guaranteed at all that Western support runs out of steam before the Russians themselves do, even if we assume that Russia is far more invested in this war than the Western populace.
Quote
The resources you're talking about that were expanded in Bakhmut were largely contract mercenaries and prisoners. I read a few Twitter opinions that Russia is actually preserving the integrity of it's armed forces with most of them basically being in static positions with very little losses. But regardless, if Russia expanded resources taking Bakhmut, it's logically consistent to acknowledge so did Ukraine. There were dozens of Ukrainian battalions in and around Bakhmut, who knows how many of those soldiers are still alive or the amount of ammunition that was expanded in the defense of the city.
These Russian losses sound insignificant on paper, but are they? Russia just threw away a large chunk of its reserve of fighting-age men who can be recruited and deployed without impacting the domestic economy or increasing the risk of uprisings from their families, etc. Mustering a similar quantity of soldiers again will not be feasible imho because they'd need to recruit ordinary citizens with jobs and families.
The final assessment of the Battle of Bakhmut of course hinges on the actual loss ratio, which we don't know. Estimates range from something like 3:1 to 1:7 (Ukrainian losses to Russian losses).
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on May 21 2023 03:33am