Lol every argument I see you get in goes like this, might be a you problem champ

3 scientists behind Putin's 'unstoppable' missiles were jailed for treason. Russian researchers say they are now living in fear.

https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-arrests-3-hypersonic-missile-scientists-for-treason-2023-5

My God you literally believe anything

The Jan 6th topic?

I was comparing 2 riot situations in the same country where the law is being applied differently for political reasons which is most def not a whataboutism. Calling this whataboutism was a cheap attempt at torpedoing a valid argument.

I'm still smiling because you started about federal building vs private property difference and I replied that a bunch of federal buildings were attacked during the Floyd riots with Portland example + source posted.

After which you decided to go back to your Soros topic ^^

This post was edited by Djunior on May 17 2023 08:11am

pard isn't famous for having people who are good at reading posts well. i tend to respond to exactly what people post, down to the word, and give them a chance to reword if they made a grammatical mistake. they get frustrated, refuse to admit they made a mistake, and then start telling me what i think.

the reason they're often wrong is because im not usually presenting a total counter argument, i'm just calling out an inconsistency in their own argument that i usually half agree with. but when people feel attacked its easier to pretend the other person totally disagrees with you and is immoral. unlike here, where void just cant read. i mean i said going into iraq was a mistake and hypocritical to our stated moral aims as a nation, then he tells me i think it was moral. just bad reading.

most of the people who post here, regardless of the side of the aisle, just aren't smart. they're not idiots, they're just pencil pushers, and it shows.

you for instance not that long ago latched onto a single word of one of my posts to tell me that i support the whole Ukrainian war and that im a monster then insulted me until you got suspended. all because u didnt read my post right (no big deal happens to us all) but then didnt listen when i told you i meant the opposite (i just laughed, u were big mad).



when someone is talking about 1 topic, and you "make a comparison", that's a whataboutism. its right there in the name, they say ____ is bad, and you say "what about ____" instead of arguing what they said is bad. its in the word itself, couldnt be much easier for someone over 60 iq.

This post was edited by thesnipa on May 17 2023 08:14am

Yeah yeah, everyone else is stupid and wrong and you are the logical genius pointing out the inconsistencies in "both sides" lmao.

Also, you deserved everything I said to you, it's too bad you didn't take my advice.

there are a few non idiots, but most people are middling. and then there's a few actual real idiots or mentally ill people (tis, llod, etc).

most people wouldn't get so worked up if they just had the ability to admit they're wrong, but it's too hard for most people. look at this DJ idiot, "it wasn't a whataboutism, all i said was what about the antifa riots". u cant fix that level of bullheadedness.

Using the word whataboutism non-ironically and expecting to be taken seriously lol

Nope

I didn't say what about .... in an attempt to deflect / change the subject --> I was comparing two very similar situations where the law is being applied differently for political reasons which is a 100% valid argument.

Just admit that it was your final attempt after I shot your "federal building" argument (with source posted).

Like I said above you do that all the time, hallmark of a (very) bad PARD poster.

Imagine if i was a shitmulti, no one would take me seriously

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/kremlin-says-three-scientists-face-very-serious-accusations-treason-case-2023-05-17/
https://news.yahoo.com/kremlin-says-three-scientists-face-100444826.html