d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1261926202621262226235001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Apr 27 2023 03:45pm
Quote (DizzyBusiness @ 27 Apr 2023 23:28)
Lmao

Russians have been in Ukraine since 1991!!! Confirmed!


If you read the article about last leaders you can see many of them died in moscow. Some in Kyiv. Russian influence decreased in this agency years after year and i guess the same happened in the whole country.
Up to a point that Moscow lost control despite the efforts, then decided to annex.
Member
Posts: 4,147
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 6.42
Warn: 10%
Apr 27 2023 03:51pm
Quote (Meanwhile @ Apr 27 2023 06:45pm)
If you read the article about last leaders you can see many of them died in moscow. Some in Kyiv. Russian influence decreased in this agency years after year and i guess the same happened in the whole country.
Up to a point that Moscow lost control despite the efforts, then decided to annex.


Of course... if half of France became an independent country today, there would be a lot of French influence in that country tomorrow wouldnt there?
Member
Posts: 39,710
Joined: Nov 16 2005
Gold: 13.37
Apr 27 2023 03:52pm
Quote (DizzyBusiness @ 28 Apr 2023 00:28)
Lmao

Russians have been in Ukraine since 1991!!! Confirmed!


Since 1917, if you please. Before 1917 they were one nation. Funny fact, Ukrainian greatest poet, the driving force of Ukrainian language was identifying himself as Russian.

This post was edited by Norlander on Apr 27 2023 03:53pm
Member
Posts: 4,147
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 6.42
Warn: 10%
Apr 27 2023 03:54pm
Quote (Norlander @ Apr 27 2023 06:52pm)
Since 1917, if you please. Before 1917 they were one nation. Funny fact, Ukrainian greatest poet, the driving force of Ukrainian language was identifying himself as Russian.


Those sneaky Russians! Creating a country just to take over it! :P
Member
Posts: 39,710
Joined: Nov 16 2005
Gold: 13.37
Apr 27 2023 03:56pm
Quote (DizzyBusiness @ 28 Apr 2023 00:54)
Those sneaky Russians! Creating a country just to take over it! :P


5D chess to start a nuclear war at the...
Member
Posts: 54,158
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Apr 27 2023 04:04pm
Quote (bogie160 @ 27 Apr 2023 21:32)
The EU has 450 million people, it is the difference between 500 versus 145 (Belarus and Ukraine join the EU) and 450 versus 200 (Russia annexes Belarus and Ukraine under the Union State). Their horrible demographics are precisely why they need to expand to survive.

Would it make Russia a superpower? No, but it would give Russia breathing room and strategic flexibility. It's pretty easy to see how a pro-American Ukraine, lord forbid Kazakhstan, would place Russia in a pretty hopeless geopolitical position. It's not great for them either way, but at that point they might as well kiss independence goodbye.


I don't disagree that these considerations might have guided Russia's decision to invade, but this is such a shortsighted logic from Russia's point of view. You know what really puts them in a hopeless geostrategic position? Alienating the biggest and richest customer for their energy exports and putting their country at the complete mercy of their perennial frenemy China. Also, it's not like the US or Europe are great powers due to the sheer size of their population - they're great powers due to their economic and technological clout (of which their military power is just a function). Even in a 450 vs 200 scenario, there was no way Russia was gonna be able to successfully invade or economically outcompete Europe for decades to come.


Moreover, sacrificing tens or even hundreds of thousands of young men for this war does't exactly improve their situation. Neither does occupying a destroyed country which will rely on economic subsidies and where 70+% of the population hate you, so that you have to permanently deploy a sizable occupying force to keep them subjugated. Such an approach makes sense if you create local microconflicts like in Transnistria or South Ossetia which keep much larger countries away from your geostrategic foes - but it's bonkers for a country the size of Ukraine.




I actually agree with you that Russia needs to expand - just not territorially, but rather economically. If the country had invested its gigantic revenue from natural resources into modernizing its infrastructure, building up its economy and establishing a girthy welfare system with particularly generous child benefits, their future could have looked so rosy. Given its abundance of natural resources, its comparatively tiny population and the fact that their nukes prevent other countries from invading them, Russia could and should have been a 30 times larger version of Norway. But I guess it was more important for their oligarchs to have multiple helipads on their mega yachts while 20% of their population don't even have running water in their shack. *shrug*
Member
Posts: 54,158
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Apr 27 2023 04:14pm
Quote (Djunior @ 27 Apr 2023 21:18)
Secondly NATO does not recognize Crimea to be Russian, therefor the status of Crimea is that it's occupied by Russia

What do you think would happen when Ukraine becomes a NATO member and insists that Crimea be returned to Ukraine??

Don't you understand the complications? Of course Russia is NOT going to accept Ukraine to become NATO member.

Again: read the fucking NATO statutes! Countries involved in ongoing military conflict or territorial disputes cannot join NATO. Ukraine would have had to officially relinquish any claims to Crimea before being able to become a NATO member. And the notion that the rest of NATO would have been willing to risk nuclear war over Crimea, just so their new friend Ukraine can get it back, is silly. Everyone knows about the strategic and symbolic importance of Crimea to Russia. Everyone knows that Russia will not give it back and use all means necessary (including nukes) to defend it. Which is why the West had more or less settled with the pre-invasion status quo.

Fact of the matter is that Russia already held Crimea, and that there was no realistic threat whatsoever to their control over it. "Ukraine wanted to join NATO, which would then have come for Crimea with so much determination that they would have risked WW3 over it. Therefore, Russia had to invade the rest of Ukraine to nip all of that in the bud" is perhaps the dumbest justification for this invasion that I've heard so far.


Quote
So you don't know that Russia leased it's naval base in Sevastopol from Ukraine??

Of course I know that. How exactly is it relevant here?

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Apr 27 2023 04:16pm
Member
Posts: 4,147
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 6.42
Warn: 10%
Apr 27 2023 04:16pm
Quote (Norlander @ Apr 27 2023 06:56pm)
5D chess to start a nuclear war at the...


Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Apr 27 2023 04:19pm
Quote (DizzyBusiness @ 27 Apr 2023 23:51)
Of course... if half of France became an independent country today, there would be a lot of French influence in that country tomorrow wouldnt there?


You will not go far with your "if" doing comparison with countries which are very different since the middle ages.
Member
Posts: 4,147
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 6.42
Warn: 10%
Apr 27 2023 04:24pm
Quote (Meanwhile @ Apr 27 2023 07:19pm)
You will not go far with your "if" doing comparison with countries which are very different since the middle ages.


Amazing that someone has managed to teach a house plant to type
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1261926202621262226235001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll