Quote (bogie160 @ 27 Apr 2023 21:32)
The EU has 450 million people, it is the difference between 500 versus 145 (Belarus and Ukraine join the EU) and 450 versus 200 (Russia annexes Belarus and Ukraine under the Union State). Their horrible demographics are precisely why they need to expand to survive.
Would it make Russia a superpower? No, but it would give Russia breathing room and strategic flexibility. It's pretty easy to see how a pro-American Ukraine, lord forbid Kazakhstan, would place Russia in a pretty hopeless geopolitical position. It's not great for them either way, but at that point they might as well kiss independence goodbye.
I don't disagree that these considerations might have guided Russia's decision to invade, but this is such a shortsighted logic from Russia's point of view. You know what really puts them in a hopeless geostrategic position? Alienating the biggest and richest customer for their energy exports and putting their country at the complete mercy of their perennial frenemy China. Also, it's not like the US or Europe are great powers due to the sheer size of their population - they're great powers due to their economic and technological clout (of which their military power is just a function). Even in a 450 vs 200 scenario, there was no way Russia was gonna be able to successfully invade or economically outcompete Europe for decades to come.
Moreover, sacrificing tens or even hundreds of thousands of young men for this war does't exactly improve their situation. Neither does occupying a destroyed country which will rely on economic subsidies and where 70+% of the population hate you, so that you have to permanently deploy a sizable occupying force to keep them subjugated. Such an approach makes sense if you create local microconflicts like in Transnistria or South Ossetia which keep much larger countries away from your geostrategic foes - but it's bonkers for a country the size of Ukraine.
I actually agree with you that Russia needs to expand - just not territorially, but rather economically. If the country had invested its gigantic revenue from natural resources into modernizing its infrastructure, building up its economy and establishing a girthy welfare system with particularly generous child benefits, their future could have looked so rosy. Given its abundance of natural resources, its comparatively tiny population and the fact that their nukes prevent other countries from invading them, Russia could and should have been a 30 times larger version of Norway. But I guess it was more important for their oligarchs to have multiple helipads on their mega yachts while 20% of their population don't even have running water in their shack. *shrug*