d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev12592602612622634529Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 4,591
Joined: Jan 30 2021
Gold: 751.50
Mar 24 2022 09:33am
Quote (thesnipa @ Mar 24 2022 03:29pm)
ive never said anything of the contrary. ive said from the start that his pretense of protecting ethnic russians was always a farce, as is his silly stuff about nazis. it always has been about the tug of war to control the sphere of influence.

but im not going to cry for a dictator who sits on the largest pile of nukes in the world that doesnt give 2 shits about the impoverished in his own country. its not entirely dissimilar to North Korea, should we let the people there starve in the hopes they someday overthrow the govt? or should we flood them with food in the hopes that even a small % makes its way into the rural districts to the peasants? we could placate Russia for 3 centuries and what would be the outcome? good for Russian poor? good for the west? or good just for the oligarchy and regime in Russia? i think the latter.


fair enough, most npc's here dont get that at all

russia not going to turn into a democracy even when putin is gone and we dont buy oil from them for a few years

there is no alternative to sanctions, but people expect way too much especially since nations like china and india arent even joining

especially here in europe its just appalling how polticians have no problem impoverishing citizens even more (as if covid wasnt enough) to "show putin who is boss" and pushing their agenda while pretending to help ukraine

the german government cant even send proper weapons, but they tell us to eat less meat and how 15 degrees celsius in your house are enough



Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Mar 24 2022 09:35am
Quote (ferdia @ 24 Mar 2022 14:51)
Western media has:

5,000 in the area
+40,000 added now
and that 100,000 American troops are on the ground

im sure more sources will provide further details

/e my view on the causes of the war are well documented. if people dont agree with me thats fine. I dont see the need to argue, and would rather look|discuss what happens next.


Oh were was more already ? ty info
btw you better quote people else they don't know that you responded
Member
Posts: 51,724
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 15,520.00
Mar 24 2022 09:37am
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Mar 24 2022 03:35pm)
Oh were was more already ? ty info
btw you better quote people else they don't know that you responded


its a habit, your not the first to say this to me! apparently its "passive aggressive behavior", or so i have been told (i just call it being lazy on my part XD)

Quote (Santara @ Mar 24 2022 03:27pm)
It's not his forest. It's his neighbor's forest.


If you want to take that analogy 1 step further - its not his forest anymore, he has retreated further and further as his habitat is encroached upon. eventually his species will die out as occurs in nature for a variety of species. the only problem with this analogy is that other species dont have nuclear weapons (or well, does covid count? wait no, that was engineered by humans not nature, so nevermind) whoops I went all conspiracy theory there.

This post was edited by ferdia on Mar 24 2022 09:42am
Member
Posts: 128
Joined: Mar 10 2022
Gold: 0.00
Mar 24 2022 09:40am
Quote (thesnipa @ Mar 24 2022 05:27pm)
nukes dont care much about proximity, nor do cyber attacks.


Perhaps, but are you trying to obfusticate what you mentioned earlier (and that I agree with), that the initiative is in USA hands and they have been for many years proactively pushing Russia into a tighter and tighter corner? Isn't that aggressive and expansionalist?

Quote (thesnipa @ Mar 24 2022 05:27pm)
i'm not a NATO/UN/Western idealist, i realize we're not without faults and evil acts ourselves. but in a binary making no choice is cowardice.


If you have to make a choice, why does it have to be against Russia? Why not use the democratic means to demand your government stop such expansionist policies and step on other big powers' toes in their own front yards?
PS: I don't assign blame to American voters or citizens, but I think your system doesn't allow this... You have no real say about this.

Quote (thesnipa @ Mar 24 2022 05:27pm)
Plan B i imagine is the NATO troops on standby and prayers for interceptor missiles if they push the big red button.


I hope American administration has a better plan than that :P

Member
Posts: 34,401
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 283.37
Mar 24 2022 09:47am
Quote (Lebanon961 @ Mar 24 2022 11:24am)
You are rationalizing I am afraid :)
You said it yourself, USA is pushing NATO to encircle Russia in its own front yard, thousands of miles away from American borders, in order to force it to disarm and bring the nation to its knees. Who is aggressive and expansionist here?
And what is Plan B if the bear doesn't decide to slowly die of starvation, and instead make a desperate run for food with nothing to lose?


Both are expansionist powers. The American yolk is considerably lighter, though, because it accompanies economic growth and far less oppression.

The United States has the right to do whatever it wants. Russia has no right to the Ukraine outside of what it can militarily impose. As we're learning, Russia's reach is very short indeed.

Now, is American policy here, specifically with respect to central bank sanctions, going to backfire? Perhaps, time will tell, but I'm tired of these farcical arguments to the effect of "Russia has a right to sovereignty over Ukraine". They have a right to nothing that they can't seize with their own hands.
Member
Posts: 51,724
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 15,520.00
Mar 24 2022 09:56am
Quote (bogie160 @ Mar 24 2022 03:47pm)
Both are expansionist powers. The American yolk is considerably lighter, though, because it accompanies economic growth and far less oppression.

The United States has the right to do whatever it wants. Russia has no right to the Ukraine outside of what it can militarily impose. As we're learning, Russia's reach is very short indeed.

Now, is American policy here, specifically with respect to central bank sanctions, going to backfire? Perhaps, time will tell, but I'm tired of these farcical arguments to the effect of "Russia has a right to sovereignty over Ukraine". They have a right to nothing that they can't seize with their own hands.


Russia is not expansionist. America is not expansionist either. Nato is expansionist. Who said that Russia had a sovereignty over Ukraine? Can you link the post please ? Finally, I dont agree that because one is bigger ergo one have the right to bully other people.

also from Russian Media ~

BRUSSELS, March 24. /TASS/. NATO will not send forces to Ukraine, because it would lead to a full-scale conflict with Russia, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said at a press conference Thursday. "At the same time, we have a responsibility to ensure that the conflict [in Ukraine] does not become a full-fledged war between NATO and Russia," Stoltenberg said, answering a question about Poland’s proposal to send a peacekeeping mission to Ukraine. "We will not deploy troops on the ground in Ukraine, because the only way to do that is to be prepared to engaged in a full conflict with Russian troops".

This post was edited by ferdia on Mar 24 2022 09:57am
Member
Posts: 91,169
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Mar 24 2022 09:57am
Quote (Lebanon961 @ Mar 24 2022 10:40am)
Perhaps, but are you trying to obfusticate what you mentioned earlier (and that I agree with), that the initiative is in USA hands and they have been for many years proactively pushing Russia into a tighter and tighter corner? Isn't that aggressive and expansionalist?



If you have to make a choice, why does it have to be against Russia? Why not use the democratic means to demand your government stop such expansionist policies and step on other big powers' toes in their own front yards?
PS: I don't assign blame to American voters or citizens, but I think your system doesn't allow this... You have no real say about this.



I hope American administration has a better plan than that :P


because i side with bad over worse. again, refusing to take sides in a binary is cowardice, not heroism. i dont want to stop putting russia into a chokehold, i want another fall of the soviet union and hopefully sending their nukes into the sun if possible. a nice dream to maintain in any case.
Member
Posts: 128
Joined: Mar 10 2022
Gold: 0.00
Mar 24 2022 09:58am
Quote (bogie160 @ Mar 24 2022 05:47pm)
Both are expansionist powers. The American yolk is considerably lighter, though, because it accompanies economic growth and far less oppression.

The United States has the right to do whatever it wants. Russia has no right to the Ukraine outside of what it can militarily impose. As we're learning, Russia's reach is very short indeed.

Now, is American policy here, specifically with respect to central bank sanctions, going to backfire? Perhaps, time will tell, but I'm tired of these farcical arguments to the effect of "Russia has a right to sovereignty over Ukraine". They have a right to nothing that they can't seize with their own hands.


A bit too right-wing for my taste but I respect this argument as wholesome, not self contradictory nor hypocritical :)
Member
Posts: 51,724
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 15,520.00
Mar 24 2022 09:58am
Quote (thesnipa @ Mar 24 2022 03:57pm)
because i side with bad over worse. again, refusing to take sides in a binary is cowardice, not heroism. i dont want to stop putting russia into a chokehold, i want another fall of the soviet union and hopefully sending their nukes into the sun if possible. a nice dream to maintain in any case.


I think he was suggesting that another option, or side, would be to vote for another party, one which is not warmongering on the far side of the planet. completely unrealistic of course in american society noting the sides are so entrenched and the state of its media, but still.

This post was edited by ferdia on Mar 24 2022 10:00am
Member
Posts: 91,169
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Mar 24 2022 10:00am
Quote (ferdia @ Mar 24 2022 10:58am)
I think he was suggesting that another option, or side, would be to vote for another party, one which is not warmongering on the far side of the planet.


sure, and im not for letting Russia be a shit tier dictatorship that oppresses it's own people while spending inordinate percentages of their budget on weaponry and cyber warfare. im not for all out war but im not against economic sanctions or selling ukranians as many weapons as they want. what will the part of peace and love get us?
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12592602612622634529Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll