Quote (Neptunus @ Apr 17 2023 09:49pm)
Agreed, and like ive said earlier, the Ukraine war made me even more critical of the Iraq war. I was also pretty young back then when the invasion occurred, so i didnt know a lot about it but i do recall a lot of stuff about it. The issue here is that were talking about geopolitics of greatee powers/superpowers, but forget to consider the geopolitics of the smaller players. Ukraine, Finland, Baltics, Georgia, all play their own geopolitical game. But no matter whose security concerns are the must justified from their own perspective, no matter the disputes, territorial inviolability is the only ideal that everyone should be able to agree upon. Not adhering to that is being the bad guy. Be it the US, Russia, China, anything.
flipping a country via political means instead of by the end of a barrel of a gun is more palatable to the world, but some countries will not be happy. There are alot of examples relating to the US, China and Russia in this regard. (I name those big 3 noting there are alot of examples from each).
USA: Rigs elections in countries 24/7 (they are good at it)
China: using the carrot to get neutral countries on their side, or the stick with taiwan.
Russia: Communism pre 2000 and rigs elections in countries (they are not good at it, communism failed and they could not keep Ukraine in their sphere).
This post was edited by ferdia on Apr 17 2023 02:58pm