But it doesn't mean they are serious

The usual "Hypocrite" "liar" "tool" "dishonest" "drone" ... Doing whataboutism with false equivalence, and derailing.

Happy Easter!


This post was edited by DizzyBusiness on Apr 16 2023 04:07pm

whataboutism x3

So, like CNN, WaPo, NYT, etc?

This post was edited by Goomshill on Apr 16 2023 11:11pm

Sounds like you don't know what it means



It's in the wiki you linked:
In January 2022, the Center for Countering Digital Hate criticized the company for allowing content which could be dangerous to public health, estimating it earned $2.5 million per year from the top five anti-vax authors alone, who have tens of thousands of subscribers.

+ad homien

How does vaccination in any shape or form relate to the discussion? ad hominem, rather than discuss what he said, you are attacking his character based on something completely unrelated. Everything you say is garbage.

This post was edited by ownyaah on Apr 16 2023 11:52pm

i agree with this sentiment. attacking character to refute story is not a good argument. better to find a way to counter the claim.

He is a journalist, who writes many stories. do you refute story because you have conflicting information on 1-2 of his stories ? (this is a rhetorical question).

This post was edited by ferdia on Apr 17 2023 12:50am

lmao

"The center for calling anyone we dont like literally hitler"

This post was edited by Goomshill on Apr 17 2023 01:14am

The right way to respond to such posts is:

This organization is British/American, and therefore it will promote British/American interests. From Wiki I see this:

Campaigns
Campaign against Galloway
Further information: Twitter suspensions

In January 2020, the CCDH campaigned against ... George Galloway, a veteran left-wing politician and broadcaster.[9] TV presenter Rachel Riley and the CCDH directly lobbied "big tech" companies to have ... individual removed from major social media platforms. According to media reports, Riley and Imran Ahmed had a "secret meeting" with Twitter's London based staff in January 2020, demanding the removal of ... Galloway from their platform.[10]

CCDH's attempt to remove Galloway from Twitter failed.

In case you are wondering who George Galloway is, here a video of him testifying to the US senate.


Thats a snippet of a longer video, freely available on youtube. If ANY user can provide a video of him which is highly questionable/dangerous content, feel free to refer it to me for consideration (for me to review my position).

In the meantime, to my mind the organization you have referred to has questionable motives.

This post was edited by ferdia on Apr 17 2023 02:19am