d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Covid 19 Vaccine
Prev12542552562572581275Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
May 22 2021 11:43pm
Quote (TiStuff @ May 23 2021 12:19am)
lol you botch it again. do i have to post the function of the lymphatic system again? and why the contents of the "jab" enters the circulatory system. and you dont know chit about the PCR test either or why its spitting out false positives cause your a covid groupie.


:rofl:

Then show your evidence that 1) It enters the blood in a significant way. 2) PCR tests as they currently exist would respond to the spike protein RNA. 3) That a nasal swab picks up RNA from blood circulation 4) That RNA picked up from blood circulation is present in enough quantity and undamaged enough to produce results on a PCR test.

Until you have all of this evidence you are making things up, and if any one of them comes up negative you lose.

I actually just did your work for you. I looked up the CDC approved PCR products and couldn't find any that target the spike protein section of the viral genome. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/downloads/List-of-Acceptable-Commercial-Primers-Probes.pdf

So if you can't find any that don't specifically target the spike protein (S gene) then you are dead in the water with your claims.




Just so you know, PCR is something I do at my full time job at least weekly and sometimes I have to do it multiple times a day. Designing new PCR experiments is a routine thing for me. So when you try to make shit up about PCR, it's easy to recognize. In fact I will be deploying a new protocol I developed last week either tomorrow or Monday. Hooray!

This post was edited by Thor123422 on May 22 2021 11:44pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
May 22 2021 11:50pm
Oh, here's another one. I've actually done experiments where we do siRNA treatments on mice, and then do PCR testing on tissues to confirm presence or absence of the gene. We will do the experiment on a mouse with gene X, and another mouse with gene X cut out as a negative control. After giving the siRNA to the gene to knock it out and do the experiment we will do PCR on the tissues to confirm presence of the gene of interest so we know the response was truly due to the gene being knocked out by the drug.

It is not a concern in any way that we've been treating them with complementary RNA for months on end when we do the final PCR testing. RNA just doesn't stay in the blood that long and doesn't stay at concentrations high enough for PCR even immediately after a treatment. Relative to the size of the mouse we're giving many thousands of times more RNA than you are getting from the vaccine.

I probably know more about this subject than everybody else who posts on JSP combined. You aren't going to get your bullshit past me lol.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on May 22 2021 11:51pm
Member
Posts: 47,240
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
May 22 2021 11:59pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ May 22 2021 10:43pm)
:rofl:

Then show your evidence that 1) It enters the blood in a significant way. 2) PCR tests as they currently exist would respond to the spike protein RNA. 3) That a nasal swab picks up RNA from blood circulation 4) That RNA picked up from blood circulation is present in enough quantity and undamaged enough to produce results on a PCR test.

Until you have all of this evidence you are making things up, and if any one of them comes up negative you lose.

I actually just did your work for you. I looked up the CDC approved PCR products and couldn't find any that target the spike protein section of the viral genome. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/downloads/List-of-Acceptable-Commercial-Primers-Probes.pdf

So if you can't find any that don't specifically target the spike protein (S gene) then you are dead in the water with your claims.




Just so you know, PCR is something I do at my full time job at least weekly and sometimes I have to do it multiple times a day. Designing new PCR experiments is a routine thing for me. So when you try to make shit up about PCR, it's easy to recognize. In fact I will be deploying a new protocol I developed last week either tomorrow or Monday. Hooray!


i dont think you do chit but make up a bunch of crap to bamboozle people with like the stupid 50 mask 50 mile run you pulled out of your imagination

pcr targets genetic sequences and also has the cycles turned way up. thats part of the fraud of the whole thing to ramp up them fuking "CASES"CASES"CASES" it wouldnt be detecting spike proteins but the remnants of it.

you dont do chit but jabber alot. the "vaccine" shot is going to enter the circulatory system as easily as a snake venom bite.
you come up negative right out of the gate
" 1) It enters the blood in a significant way. "
Snakebite lymphatics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_K3fDRdq7A
Member
Posts: 47,240
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
May 23 2021 12:00am
Quote (Thor123422 @ May 22 2021 10:50pm)
Oh, here's another one. I've actually done experiments where we do siRNA treatments on mice, and then do PCR testing on tissues to confirm presence or absence of the gene. We will do the experiment on a mouse with gene X, and another mouse with gene X cut out as a negative control. After giving the siRNA to the gene to knock it out and do the experiment we will do PCR on the tissues to confirm presence of the gene of interest so we know the response was truly due to the gene being knocked out by the drug.

It is not a concern in any way that we've been treating them with complementary RNA for months on end when we do the final PCR testing. RNA just doesn't stay in the blood that long and doesn't stay at concentrations high enough for PCR even immediately after a treatment. Relative to the size of the mouse we're giving many thousands of times more RNA than you are getting from the vaccine.

I probably know more about this subject than everybody else who posts on JSP combined. You aren't going to get your bullshit past me lol.


you are crushed at number one
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
May 23 2021 12:04am
Quote (TiStuff @ May 23 2021 12:59am)
i dont think you do chit but make up a bunch of crap to bamboozle people with like the stupid 50 mask 50 mile run you pulled out of your imagination

pcr targets genetic sequences and also has the cycles turned way up. thats part of the fraud of the whole thing to ramp up them fuking "CASES"CASES"CASES" it wouldnt be detecting spike proteins but the remnants of it.

you dont do chit but jabber alot. the "vaccine" shot is going to enter the circulatory system as easily as a snake venom bite.
you come up negative right out of the gate
" 1) It enters the blood in a significant way. "
Snakebite lymphatics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_K3fDRdq7A


:rofl:

PCR doesn't detect spike proteins. PCR doesn't detect any proteins ever, under any circumstances. I couldn't have picked a more perfect example to demonstrate you don't know even the most basics of PCR.

You didn't show any evidence. Snake venom is not a vaccine. They are not comparable in any way. You might as well be pointing out that water gets into the blood. No shit, doesn't mean other things do.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on May 23 2021 12:04am
Member
Posts: 17,581
Joined: Mar 5 2016
Gold: 27.45
Warn: 40%
May 23 2021 12:27am
Quote (TiStuff @ May 23 2021 12:48am)
o wow dude you mean the jab also programs your cells to die, thats fantastic.


No but your body programs thousands of cells to die every second.

natural is the selection

Quote (Thor123422 @ May 23 2021 02:25am)
Anything that gives you immunity without contracting the disease is a vaccine. No definition change needed.


poliomyelitis though

This post was edited by Melatonina on May 23 2021 12:29am
Member
Posts: 47,240
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
May 23 2021 12:31am
Quote (Thor123422 @ May 22 2021 11:04pm)
:rofl:

PCR doesn't detect spike proteins. PCR doesn't detect any proteins ever, under any circumstances. I couldn't have picked a more perfect example to demonstrate you don't know even the most basics of PCR.

You didn't show any evidence. Snake venom is not a vaccine. They are not comparable in any way. You might as well be pointing out that water gets into the blood. No shit, doesn't mean other things do.


any one can see how cheaply you play your straw mans. pcr detects genetic sequences, remnants of the spike protein. remnants remnants remnants remnants i said remnants

no one said snake venom is a "vaccine" you suk at strawmanning. its used as an comparison how injected liquid enters the circulatory system.
bich and straw man all you want. you might refuse to see it but any one else can. your exposed right at your number 1. could just as easily be titled vaccine lymphatics.
" 1) It enters the blood in a significant way. "
Snakebite lymphatics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_K3fDRdq7A

what did you say? "...and if any one of them comes up negative you lose."
(you came up negative and just had to do the first one..............u lose)
Member
Posts: 47,240
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
May 23 2021 12:33am
Quote (Melatonina @ May 22 2021 11:27pm)
No but your body programs thousands of cells to die every second.

natural is the selection



poliomyelitis though


cells die yes but they also divide. the mRNA knows to go with the cell thats going to die?
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
May 23 2021 12:34am
Quote (TiStuff @ May 23 2021 01:31am)
any one can see how cheaply you play your straw mans. pcr detects genetic sequences, remnants of the spike protein. remnants remnants remnants remnants i said remnants

no one said snake venom is a "vaccine" you suk at strawmanning. its used as an comparison how injected liquid enters the circulatory system.
bich and straw man all you want. you might refuse to see it but any one else can. your exposed right at your number 1. could just as easily be titled vaccine lymphatics.
" 1) It enters the blood in a significant way. "
Snakebite lymphatics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_K3fDRdq7A

what did you say? "...and if any one of them comes up negative you lose."
(you came up negative and just had to do the first one..............u lose)


Genetic sequences are not remnants of the spike protein. What a dumb statement you just made.

Show me why you would expect the vaccine to behave like snake venom. I only have to prove one wrong. You have to prove all 4 right for your claim to even have a chance at being true. So far you've given zero evidence and ive actively debunked one.
Member
Posts: 17,581
Joined: Mar 5 2016
Gold: 27.45
Warn: 40%
May 23 2021 12:36am
Quote (TiStuff @ May 23 2021 08:33am)
cells die yes but they also divide. the mRNA knows to go with the cell thats going to die?


The cells are programed to. No wonder you cant grasp the concept of renewal lol, you like to regurgitate the same shit over and over like an authist

This post was edited by Melatonina on May 23 2021 12:36am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12542552562572581275Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll