d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1253825392540254125425001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 9,702
Joined: Mar 2 2006
Gold: 1,590.00
Apr 12 2023 05:22am
Quote (Meanwhile @ 12 Apr 2023 12:01)
I cannot recognize a full sovereignty for countries where governement is not representing the will of the people.


Since you are posting in Russia/Ukraine topic - does your statement mean you do not recognize the sovereignty of Ukraine where a foreign sponsored coup d’etat has overthrown a democratically elected government?

Member
Posts: 45,719
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 40,130.00
Apr 12 2023 05:24am
Quote (Malopox @ 12 Apr 2023 19:22)
Since you are posting in Russia/Ukraine topic - does your statement mean you do not recognize the sovereignty of Ukraine where a foreign sponsored coup d’etat has overthrown a democratically elected government?


His reasoning for will of the people is this

" I cannot recognize a full sovereignty for countries where government is not representing the will of the people. And the will of the people must fit my political agenda. If it doesn't, it is not the will of the people. "

No. 1 Shit poster on Pard for the past 15 years.

Even Palasan / Lvivz has more integrity than him. :lol:

This post was edited by Hamsterbaby on Apr 12 2023 05:25am
Member
Posts: 23,947
Joined: Jul 15 2008
Gold: 122,361.69
Apr 12 2023 05:24am
Countries rarely follow "the will of the people", this is such a stupid statement.

They do however do what is the perceived action that will benefit the people (and in many cases it is miscalculated/incorrect)

Quote (Hamsterbaby @ Apr 12 2023 01:24pm)
His reasoning for will of the people is this

" I cannot recognize a full sovereignty for countries where government is not representing the will of the people. And the will of the people must fit my political agenda. If it doesn't, it is not the will of the people. "

No. 1 Shit poster on Pard for the past 15 years.


By his logic, US/Australia/UK/France/Poland also aren´t sovereign countries. I can promise you, french bombing of Libya isn´t a very popular topic in france.

This post was edited by ownyaah on Apr 12 2023 05:25am
Member
Posts: 45,719
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 40,130.00
Apr 12 2023 05:26am
Quote (ownyaah @ 12 Apr 2023 19:24)
Countries rarely follow "the will of the people", this is such a stupid statement.

They do however do what is the perceived action that will benefit the people (and in many cases it is miscalculated/incorrect)



By his logic, US/Australia/UK/France/Poland also aren´t sovereign countries.


By his logic, we have to create a coalition of willing and invade USA from the clutches of the Democrats.
Member
Posts: 23,947
Joined: Jul 15 2008
Gold: 122,361.69
Apr 12 2023 05:28am
Quote (Hamsterbaby @ Apr 12 2023 01:26pm)
By his logic, we have to create a coalition of willing and invade USA from the clutches of the Democrats.


Actually, looking back the iraqi war isn´t something every day americans look fondly at. That means, US wasn´t sovereign during bush administration.

The destruction of Libya is another example, so the US wasn´t sovereign during Obama either.
Member
Posts: 9,702
Joined: Mar 2 2006
Gold: 1,590.00
Apr 12 2023 05:28am
Quote (Hamsterbaby @ 12 Apr 2023 12:24)

Even Palasan / Lvivz has more integrity than him. :lol:


was a solid kid. It’s a shame he got drafted into the military and we never heard from him.

Hope he is alive.

Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Apr 12 2023 05:29am
Quote (ownyaah @ 12 Apr 2023 13:19)
Okay, by that definition sovereign countries are ruled by the will of the people

So the US, a sovereign nation, and the decision to invade and kill 1 million Iraqis was the will of the people?

Either you have to say the US wasn´t a sovereign country or you have to put the blame on 330 million Americans.

Your logic is garbage either way.


I'm talking about the legitimacy of the political & constitutional systems. Citizen control & oppression are factors too.
I Specified it already but seems i need to repeat; it is not a binary value: More or less.

So take Syria: nope, whatever you like it or not.
Member
Posts: 39,685
Joined: Nov 16 2005
Gold: 13.37
Apr 12 2023 05:29am
Quote (Hamsterbaby @ 12 Apr 2023 14:24)
His reasoning for will of the people is this

" I cannot recognize a full sovereignty for countries where government is not representing the will of the people. And the will of the people must fit my political agenda. If it doesn't, it is not the will of the people. "

No. 1 Shit poster on Pard for the past 15 years.

Even Palasan / Lvivz has more integrity than him. :lol:


Oleg will be forever in our hearts
Member
Posts: 23,947
Joined: Jul 15 2008
Gold: 122,361.69
Apr 12 2023 05:31am
Quote (Meanwhile @ Apr 12 2023 01:29pm)
I'm talking about the legitimacy of the political & constitutional systems. Citizen control & oppression are factors too.
I Specified it already but seems i need to repeat; it is not a binary value: More or less.

So take Syria: nope, whatever you like it or not.


Binary when you want, nonbinary when you don´t. Like i said, you are a selective hypocrite. When Bush lied about weapons of mass destruction, it wasn´t "citizen control".

US isn´t a sovereign country by your logic:
"In June a CBS poll found 59% of the country believed it should not be involved in the conflict,[74] while a Rasmussen Reports poll found only 26% believed the U.S. should continue military operations.[75]

This post was edited by ownyaah on Apr 12 2023 05:41am
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Apr 12 2023 05:49am
Quote (ownyaah @ 12 Apr 2023 13:31)
Binary when you want, nonbinary when you don´t. Like i said, you are a selective hypocrite. When Bush lied about weapons of mass destruction, it wasn´t "citizen control".

US isn´t a sovereign country by your logic:
"In June a CBS poll found 59% of the country believed it should not be involved in the conflict,[74] while a Rasmussen Reports poll found only 26% believed the U.S. should continue military operations.[75]



Always said it was NOT a binary factor:
https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=92094408&f=119&p=644396053
"more or less"

And for the reader endowed with understanding I suppose that one could begin to evaluate the sovereignty of a country by 2 large primary sets: 1 / interior (representation system and "respect" of the people) 2 / exterior (cohesion of the military forces and representatives).
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1253825392540254125425001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll