No room for shit trolling here, sorry.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Syrian_presidential_election
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Syrian_presidential_election
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Syrian_presidential_election

You didn't answer about the 15000$ thing.



I'm not here for psychological support: sorry Bananii.

This post was edited by Meanwhile on Apr 12 2023 02:40am

But you can answer a simple question no?

Or you only answer questions which are worth to get answered from your side?

Cmon show off your objectivity, im waiting

We are talking about two different countries.

You are bringing an example of Syria with their own style of governance whereby a National Assembly is elected (where Ba’ath has won mostly over the years). Presidential candidate is proposed by the parliament and then reinforced by the general election (although an election out of 1 candidate seems funny, so they might just skip this step going forward and just appoint president/PM directly like other countries - eg The Netherlands).

To make your argument more solid I would show the results of Syrian National Assembly election over the years to show that Ba’ath party has held majority and elected the same guy over and over again.

I’m showing you an example of another country which is playing by “the rules” albeight with the same result.

Would you say Sharia law would have been better for Syria should Assad have been overthrown? What do you propose as a solution.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Syrian_parliamentary_election

In practice, the power exercises a pre-selection and a censorship which makes any beginning of pluralism impossible.
Committees appointed by a commission whose members are themselves chosen by the president decide on the validity of the candidacies of the “workers and peasants”
While the parties which can compete for the remaining half of the seats to be filled are subject to draconian laws prohibiting any criticism of power under cover of a ban on "undermining national sentiment", under penalty of banning the party.
The small political parties other than the Baath Party, all members of the National Progressive Front, are thus all subordinate to it.

You have changed my quote to something I haven’t not said. I’m not engaging with you anymore.

I’ve clearly told you in my previous posts - im showing you an example of another country which has the same results effectivelly as one party re-elects the same guy (now his son). Critics of the government have been known to be sued and fined applied to them, see this link:

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/li-shengwu-sentenced-to-15000-fine-for-contempt-one-weeks-jail-if-he-does-not

He belongs to one of the three stooges of Pard.

I cannot recognize a full sovereignty for countries where governement is not representing the will of the people.

He atleast could have shown balls with answering that simple question

I think he went for full transition so maybe we should cut him some slack.

Okay, by that definition sovereign countries are ruled by the will of the people

So the US, a sovereign nation, by the will of the people invaded and killed 1 million Iraqis.

Either you have to say the US wasn´t a sovereign country or you have to put the blame on 330 million Americans.

Your logic is garbage either way. Well there isn´t any logic, you are a loser who thinks to highly of himself.

This post was edited by ownyaah on Apr 12 2023 05:22am