Would not be suprised if bad things happened to Russian rapists and murderers, lmk what would typical right wing american voter answer/think about the fate of these people ?

This post was edited by Meanwhile on Mar 25 2023 08:33am

Weren’t you against war crimes or something? Gotta be consistent, buddy.

This post was edited by Malopox on Mar 25 2023 08:38am

The average American gives about as much care to the fate of folks in fuckaluckistan as they do to what happens to their turds after they flush the toilet. When the fuckaluckistanis start flooding their streets, they care.

This gives us the surpreme predictability of how the war ends. American support can't keep pace with American indifference. The Russians are all-in, the US media is trying very very hard to convince Americans to care about how our war criminals fare against their war criminals. And even among the flock of groupthinking liberals they are failing.

I said i would not be suprised, not that i was supporting. Im not your buddy, StalVlad.



You didn't answer to my question for obvious reasons.

This post was edited by Meanwhile on Mar 25 2023 08:47am

Are we the baddies ?

As usual I answered it in a way an average person could understand

Ive said this a few times in this thread.. Whether it is this war or any other. I don't think there should be "war crimes" label for people defending their country.
Same as somebody breaking into you house.. Want to get treated well then GTFO

Unlike house breaking in castle doctrine states, international conflicts are nuanced and lack a sovereign authority capable of adjudicating (by force) whose right and wrong.

War crimes exist to moderate the conduct of warring parties, otherwise we just accept that every country will claim to be in the moral right and everything goes.

I fully understand its not an "enforceable" thing or even something that will ever be decided on. Just a personal opinion on the shit nature of attacking another people civilians.