Quote (ofthevoid @ Mar 22 2023 04:59pm)

It's not an excuse you dumb fuck. It's called logical consistency and hoping that we eventually get to live in a world where rules--if we truly care and want fairness are applied equally and consistently and not in 'rules for thee but not for me' geopolitically charged ways.

But you're the typical 'I support the current thing' simp that has no compass of world events and how they all fit. That why a few years ago you were cheering for the US to arm 'Syrian rebels' which many were just Islamists and turn-coat Al-Nusra that were literally beheading kids on the other side. People like you are the ideal person to manipulate honestly, you're not any different that the flag-waving 'support our troops' republicans of 2000s that cheered on for war. Literally duped to support every current war or intervention by the west because this time it's different, this time we are 100% the good guys and the other side is the bad.

Quote (theCrossbones @ Mar 22 2023 09:11pm)

Logical consistency would mean we all disagree with current bombing of civilians . Not trying to justify it per past mistakes made by any country for any reason.

Quote (theCrossbones @ Mar 22 2023 08:11pm)

Logical consistency would mean we all disagree with current bombing of civilians . Not trying to justify it per past mistakes made by any country for any reason.

Quote (ofthevoid @ Mar 23 2023 12:26am)

Logical consistency would be always to disagree with bombing and invasions not conveniently all do the sudden care when our geopolitical enemy does it. How many time did we refer to our troops or UK soldiers as orcs? How many times did we demand that the UN seize US or UK assets abroad and freeze and sanction them when we went to a country on the premise that they had WMD's and after a few months of 100% knowing they didn't we stayed for another 9 years?

Quote (ofthevoid @ 23 Mar 2023 00:59)

It's not an excuse you dumb fuck. It's called logical consistency and hoping that we eventually get to live in a world where rules--if we truly care and want fairness are applied equally and consistently and not in 'rules for thee but not for me' geopolitically charged ways.

But you're the typical 'I support the current thing' simp that has no compass of world events and how they all fit. That why a few years ago you were cheering for the US to arm 'Syrian rebels' which many were just Islamists and turn-coat Al-Nusra that were literally beheading kids on the other side. People like you are the ideal person to manipulate honestly, you're not any different that the flag-waving 'support our troops' republicans of 2000s that cheered on for war. Literally duped to support every current war or intervention by the west because this time it's different, this time we are 100% the good guys and the other side is the bad.

Quote (ofthevoid @ Mar 22 2023 05:26pm)

Logical consistency would be always to disagree with bombing and invasions not conveniently all do the sudden care when our geopolitical enemy does it. How many times did we refer to our troops or UK soldiers as orcs? How many times did we demand that the UN seize US or UK assets abroad and freeze and sanction them when we went to a country on the premise that they had WMD's and after a few months of 100% knowing they didn't we stayed for another 9 years? You confuse me pointing this out as justifying it, when in reality my intention is to destroy this fake ass facade of care.

Quote (DizzyBusiness @ Mar 22 2023 05:22pm)

How many posts did you make about Ukraine bombing its people in Donetsk for years? Rough number is fine

Quote (theCrossbones @ Mar 22 2023 09:37pm)

Was not posting in this forum during that time

Quote (theCrossbones @ Mar 22 2023 08:36pm)

Fyi was against all US bombing in the ME was never posting in this forum during that time. For the record was against Vietnam. Before my time. I have been always consistent with attacking people over money. Totally against it. Still am

Quote (ofthevoid @ Mar 22 2023 05:42pm)

Dude, i've heard this "i was against the prior wars" line before and tbh it's dishonest. Literally 99% of the people that are so vocal against Russia today have not applied even a small fraction of the scrutiny or criticism that's leveled today. That's great that you were against the wars priors, but again, were you referring to our soldiers as orcs or demanding that they be tried under tribunals? Were you saying they were committing genocide?