You have to talk about the future of Russia because as it stands now, in the present, Russia is doing fine.

In the future, Germany will still be what it is today. A non-country with no sovereignty, passively watching as America hollows you out by imposing higher gas prices and ripping German industry to shreds.

Talk all you want about China, too, but realize that when it comes time for America to drive a wedge between the Chinese economy and Europe, Germany will do exactly what it's doing right now, which is to do everything Washington tells it to. More than a third of BMW sales are in the Chinese market. Nearly half of Mercedes. Those sales will disappear overnight, and there is nothing Germany can do about it because Germany has no sovereignty.


In what way has Germany "not accepted the destruction" of the Nordstream pipelines? You've done literally nothing about it.

At least when America scuttled France's submarine deal with Australia, France threw a little hissy fit and recalled their ambassador for a little while. All show, but Germany can't even muster that, lmao. Just a completely cowed, broken nation.

America blew up your pipelines, tricked you into sending tanks to get demilitarized in Ukraine, passed the IRA that is designed to poach your industries, and you've done nothing at all about any of it, because Germany is not a sovereign country.

If only someone could have predicted that US foreign policy in Eastern Europe would lead to this.

Russia, the world's largest nuclear power, is still a threat to other countries? Shocking if true, do you have a source?

This is like reading a 6 year olds opinions on geopolitics, good lord Fenderp.

Guess the war is over, the police are on their way to the kremlin to arrest Pootin as we speak.

What will you say next ? "lalala putin is still free, ahahah you noobs" ...

Best course of action for some posters is to completely ignore them. Like the level of discourse is so bad because their grasp/take on the matter is so poorly informed/low iq that you end up dumbing yourself down with these interactions.

no, "we" (meaning people like you) want to be kept safe by NATO and big daddy USA, but not provide meaningful contributions

you literally said yourself that you dont support spending more, which is breaking a clearly agreed upon goal (2%)

and we clearly dont have the material that was promised in case of an emergency

arent you the big pro alliances guy here NATO shill? how about contributing? oh thats right, you dont even provide value for your own society

so you are not worried about russia because of big daddy USA, but at the same time you are worried enough to support a fight to the last man to push them out of a foreign country we are neither friends nor allies with, got it

go get some more orders from your TV, npc

You are right, it certainly isn't productive speaking to certain posters. I'm just feeding the troll, but in my defense it is really tempting sometimes

I'll put it in the right order so a slow person like yourself can keep up with this:

USSR fell apart, military collapsed --> NATO said gg lets profit --> round after round of expansion --> Russia says enough is enough

ampootin, the arms race and war proponent doesn't realise their talking points / orders are what's perpetuated on legacy media, while my let's not fall for that bs again stance is highly unpopular, lol.



how does NATO "profit" from nations asking to join it? define "profit". you have those simplistic ideas in your otherwise empty head that make absolutely no sense whatsoever if you just think about them for two seconds. russia murdering innocent people to conquer the country is not saying "enough" - it's saying "more".

pootin's war proves that NATO is necessary, and justifies anyone who joined it or aspires to do so. no one wants to be russia's next target - all they bring is death and destruction. NATO means freedom and prosperity. every country that joined experienced a significant increase of both, while russia remained a dirt poor shithole.