Correct

you have misquoted me.

this is my original post:





This post was edited by ferdia on Mar 12 2023 06:03am

and by "we" you clearly mean yourself and all the other kremlin bots, right? keep looking into one direction only, keep ignoring the overwhelming evidence of the other side, keep deluding yourself...

its not my fault if you dont educate yourself. it is however your fault if you dont bother to read it.

Not at all in my opinion.
Discourse and debates needs to be passionate at times but we need to use a more realistic and pragmatic lens to view things and like said , it will be best if we can use an amoral view on it since the world is not black and white and at times rather sinister shade of grey.

We need to clear our minds and look at what happen and why it happen and understand why certain countries try to trigger it and why certain countries due to their insecurities make such drastic and at times violent reaction ( All violent reaction should be condemn and the defender should have our fullest support.)

It is very complicated really , but I think we need to simplify things.

I don't have anything to refute you. You and I at times might not share the same view, but we can always agree to disagree.

Bojo said this. Can you provide the quote? No. - Fact.
The US blew up NS2. Can you provide the proof? No. - Fact.
Lavrov claims Russia was invaded by Ukraine. "We should listen to what he has to say." - Fact.

The court of circumstance and all its shill attorneys are in attendance.

As a good example:
John J. Mearsheimer is ignoring that ukrainians are using a much more precise artillery supported by drones reco: then he takes wrong conclusions based on this failed military analysis.

Fender, do you know why I dont typically respond to you, why I am so hostile to you ?

Because you are clearly highly intelligent. Far more intelligent then alot of people and probably far more intelligent then me. But your position on topic's is too self righteos and you refuse to study an issue in order to understand it. you latch onto what you perceive to be the one truth and refuse to change or open your mind.

In addition you do not debate in good faith.

This is why I think you are dangerous.

the difference between that and my argument with Prox1m1ty here is that I provide the evidence to support my view, and when proven wrong on a point by meanwhile, i acknowledge and accept his position is true.

This post was edited by ferdia on Mar 12 2023 06:14am

Look, I do also agree with you that the Chinese did nasty things to the Uyghurs.

I know that is true.
But you mentioned that the CCP genocide them. I can also ask if there is real solid proof that they actually killed them in the millions. Or genocide their entire ethincity.