Quote (babun1024 @ Mar 21 2022 03:11am)
We have them in the American government too. That could literally be a Proud Boy or Oathkeeper right there.
They also have a Jewish president, have had a woman president. So weird flex.
That is why I don't watch Youtube or documentaries for information, because you're just presented with a one sided argument with crafted context. Just watch Tiger King.
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Mar 21 2022 04:49am)
For Mariupol - yes.
For the rest of Ukraine - no, not yet. You still assume that the Ukrainians cannot fight this to a stalemate. You might be right in the end, but we cannot be sure of that as of today.
Regarding "the living under Russian influence" point:
1. From the fall of the Soviet Union until 2014, Ukraine was a country whose president was an ally of Russia (e.g. Janukovych) and made sure that it stays out of the EU/NATO, but it was otherwise relatively free. This is fundamentally different from living under full Russian rule, including a complete lack of democracy or a free press, an economy that is only a vassal of Russia, pervasive oppression of civic life, active russification of its population and so on. What Ukraine has to expect if it falls to the Russians now would be significantly worse than what they had from 1991 to 2014.
2. What does it tell you that so many Ukrainians are willing to literally give their life for this fight for independence and sovereignty? Like you just said: they have more experience living under Russian rule than anyone else - and apparently it sucked so much that they'd rather die than go back to that ever again. Who are we to tell them that they're being unreasonable and that they should just surrender?
Depends how far the people around him will let Putin go before hey wack him. It is a mafia state (kleptocracy). How profitable is the sacking and rape of Ukraine?
This post was edited by Skinned on Mar 21 2022 05:57am