If any one really listen to that whole phone call they would come away with what the TV tells people to think about it

If that's true then quote the specific part that changes the context.

why dont you just listen to the whole phone call

Already did.

Man you just can't handle that informed people disagree with you. You have to make up excuses to avoid engaging.

" Dems should take action regardless of whatever blood they have on their own hands."
(so you admit they are hypocrites? That means you agree with the speaker.)

"You can play this game ad nauseam."
(it gets played "ad nauseam" because you keep bananas in your ears)

"You say Democrats support BLM violence,"
(I can say more than that. BLM is a terrorist organization that works for the DNC. This is proven by "act blue")
BLM = Act Blue = Demonrat Party
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rGvATNMFxni1/

"I can just counter this again by saying that Republicans support police violence against minorities."
(the difference is the case id made by evidence DNC does in fact support BLM, what you offer is mere assertion.)

"She's saying that the Democrats are trash (and I don't even disagree with that),"
(here we are in agreement)

"but she's not giving any reason to Trump's own actions."
(its a one minute speech. why is she supposed to put in it what you think should be in it?)

"She had one minute and decided to fill it with fallacies. That's her loss."
(that statement it self is a fallacy)

"That's just because you follow the same logical fallacies as this speecher does"
(assertion fallacy)

i dont want to spend my time on something you will just make a snickery remark about. Yes i will still continue to believe you never listened to any of it. You sound exactly like TV news did when they took it out of context and told every one what to believe'
scientist huh? what do you think about the fact that the covid19 virus has never been isolated?

As I've said before, it's been isolated literally hundreds of times now. We have had the full genome since February or March, and we've cataloged dozens of different mutations, and we know which sequences correspond to which amino acids in which proteins to an incredible degree of accuracy.

But this is just you avoiding the question again. You can't give me a part of the call that changes the context because it doesn't exist. I'm actually 99% sure you haven't listened to the whole thing, and are just parroting what you've seen posted in bitchute.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jan 18 2021 06:08pm

bit chute is just a platform, that you can by whim disregard all content on it tells me you are being told what to think. Why should i consider anything you thing with that kind of reasoning? confining your self to your own cognitive bias. Isnt science supposed to be about observable testable repeatable?

" We have had the full genome since February or March"
(mock-ups on a computer screen)(have you noticed yet there are no more colds, flu, or phenomena any more?

one ball for each impeach

This post was edited by EndlessSky on Jan 18 2021 06:29pm