Quote (InsaneBobb @ May 28 2020 11:25am)
And you were offering them skilled tradesmen? No? Then why is this your natural response?
Go back to my first post regarding what could be done to insure jobs for inmates after their incarceration. Why would a union want unskilled labor with a rap sheet? Why would any business? If you offer them highly skilled and experienced trained labor, then the willingness to overlook the rap sheet suddenly materializes.
And even if the businesses "that exist" don't particularly want them, assuming they were to receive that training, they could easily post on the punch boards at their local stores, put their name out as contractors. And let's be honest, the average person and business hiring for contract work isn't performing intense background checks. Hell, for that matter, half the employers who claim they're going to do background checks along with drug screenings never do background checks, merely the drug screenings. Telling me there's simply "no hope" is such a bald overstatement it's almost silly, and you know it.
I'm sure the victims of the riots would agree with you, if they were still alive to do so.
Quote (Thor123422 @ May 28 2020 11:33am)
You're doing that thing again where you assume you know more than you do.
Snipa said "even entirely unskilled unions", as in the work being done by that union is unskilled, and so an unskilled person would fit right in. It doesn't matter that the place of business "isn't performing intense background checks", because pretty much any background check will turn up a prison sentence. Additionally, background checks are baked into the hiring system at every place I've worked, including Papa Johns 10 years ago. So I doubt there's many places left that have you consent to a background check and then don't do it. It's all automated and takes like a $20 fee and 30 seconds in the age of computers.
correct. there are trade's unions who are entirely unskilled, and they're as desperate for labor as any other union. job site cleaners, intro road construction labor, insulation spraying, etc. none of these are considered "skilled trades" because the training is done on the jobsite, and is in general very low training anyways.
none of these unions, which all have a demand for labor, wanted anything to do with convicts. why would an electrical union which is in demand of labor want an electrician who got trained by a cut rate program in a federal prison over someone with no record who went to a technical college on their own dime? apprenticeships are largely dead anyways in most trades, so its a choice of tech school kid over older convict.
now in a real sense would this help some small percent of convicts get jobs, of course, anything u do can have an affect. its just not going to change enough to justify developing and implementing the program.
in general bob, you're indeed doing that thing you do. flavoring your posts with an air of knowledge and authority as if you're correct. do you have any experience trying to place convicts in the midwest rural areas with trades unions? if not maybe consider shutting up when responding to someone who literally did that as a job lol. you sounds like a flat earther ranting at an airline pilot. shhhh