d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1227622772278227922805001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 4,147
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 6.42
Warn: 10%
Mar 1 2023 09:52am
Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Mar 1 2023 11:46am)
Where specifically could you see Russia targeting with a nuke?
At bold. It depends on your answer to my question.


I don't know, wherever they deemed it to be the most strategically useful. Maybe Kiev, maybe a large concentration of troops in another part of the country.
Member
Posts: 92,973
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Mar 1 2023 09:57am
Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Mar 1 2023 09:51am)
I am repeatedly asking the question over my last few posts and getting vague answers. Such as "world war three", "lol we have nukes bro"
I'll attempt another format loosely based on your own euphemism; What else do you believe Russia can "put on the table", in Ukraine?
What conventional ability does Russia possess that it is not currently applying in Ukraine?

So far I am led to believe:
- More conscripts
- Spring offensive


they still have 1 strategy from the WW2 days they haven't tried yet, give 1 soldier a gun and the next soldier in line a box of bullets. super secret money saving trick that Ukraine will never see coming.
Member
Posts: 20,044
Joined: Apr 13 2016
Gold: 32,397.50
Mar 1 2023 10:00am
Quote (DizzyBusiness @ Mar 1 2023 03:52pm)
I don't know, wherever they deemed it to be the most strategically useful. Maybe Kiev, maybe a large concentration of troops in another part of the country.


So what are the possible consequences of that do you think?
In my mind,
Certainly the destruction of Kiev.
Immediate/imminent death of 1-2 million people.
Most likely the end of a functioning autonomous Ukrainian state.
A guaranteed radioactive wasteland directly next to your own border and your allies border.
Possibly eliminate any legitimacy of your pretext for invasion with allies (China specifically) and domestically.

That is not even getting into possible repercussions from NATO for using a nuclear weapon on the European continent; To answer your question whether I think the US would retaliate with a nuke over this hypothetical attack. No. I don't think that makes sense. I think a massive conventional strike on Russian presence in Ukraine/black sea.


Is this really a potential sum gain for Russia in your mind?
Member
Posts: 4,147
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 6.42
Warn: 10%
Mar 1 2023 10:02am
Quote (thesnipa @ Mar 1 2023 11:57am)
they still have 1 strategy from the WW2 days they haven't tried yet, give 1 soldier a gun and the next soldier in line a box of bullets. super secret money saving trick that Ukraine will never see coming.


Well it did work the last time Russia was threatened by nazis with German tanks. If it ain't broke.
Member
Posts: 56,399
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 585,553.49
Mar 1 2023 10:04am
Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Mar 1 2023 03:51pm)
I am repeatedly asking the question over my last few posts and getting vague answers. Such as "world war three", "lol we have nukes bro"
I'll attempt another format loosely based on your own euphemism; What else do you believe Russia can "put on the table", in Ukraine?
What conventional ability does Russia possess that it is not currently applying in Ukraine?

So far I am led to believe:
- More conscripts
- Spring offensive



yes that, is that not enough ?

Russia is at war, what could Russia do? keep at it. If your response is "but Russia will suffer if it sends all its men to war" my response is: The Russian government does not care (in my opinion).

This post was edited by ferdia on Mar 1 2023 10:08am
Member
Posts: 92,973
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Mar 1 2023 10:07am
Quote (DizzyBusiness @ Mar 1 2023 10:02am)
Well it did work the last time Russia was threatened by nazis with German tanks. If it ain't broke.


If only they can convince Zeldog to invade them ala Napoleon/Hitler, the war is won.
Member
Posts: 20,044
Joined: Apr 13 2016
Gold: 32,397.50
Mar 1 2023 10:13am
Quote (ferdia @ Mar 1 2023 04:04pm)
yes that, is that not enough ?


Enough to deter allies from sending Ukraine systems that could potentially strike Russia's interior?

No.
Member
Posts: 56,399
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 585,553.49
Mar 1 2023 10:15am
Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Mar 1 2023 04:13pm)
Enough to deter allies from sending Ukraine systems that could potentially strike Russia's interior?

No.


Are you really giving out about US restraint ?
Member
Posts: 20,044
Joined: Apr 13 2016
Gold: 32,397.50
Mar 1 2023 10:16am
Quote (ferdia @ Mar 1 2023 04:15pm)
Are you really giving out about US restraint ?


What?
Member
Posts: 56,399
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 585,553.49
Mar 1 2023 10:17am
Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Mar 1 2023 04:16pm)
What?


The US is purposely not giving Ukraine long range missiles / jets etc as THEY understand that this would put the war into uncharted territory that they (the US) might not have an exit strategy for. At a certain point in wars stuff happens that you can not reverse.

As an example: the peace treaty of last year was abandoned - as a consequence any new settlement will be worse for Ukraine.

So putting this into context: If Ukraine were to cause symbolic damage to Russia, Russia may take steps which do not have a reverse pedal and with each escalation we move closer and closer to a direct conflict between Nato (US) and Russia, which to be clear: the US DOES NOT WANT (Neither does Russia).

This post was edited by ferdia on Mar 1 2023 10:24am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1227622772278227922805001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll