I would then not dispute your claim of "on record"

I'd say that is very reasonable.

This post was edited by Prox1m1ty on Feb 22 2023 10:34am

Lets try from another angle:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Russia%E2%80%93Ukraine_peace_negotiations

read that and then challenge me.

"According to a May report from Ukrainska Pravda, the Russian side was ready for a meeting between Zelenskyy and Putin, but it later came to a halt after the discovery of Russian war crimes in Ukraine, and the surprise visit on 9 April of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson who told Zelenskyy "Putin is a war criminal, he should be pressured, not negotiated with," and that "even if Ukraine is ready to sign some agreements on guarantees with Putin, they are not.""

So the "record" you are referring to is Ukrainska Pravda? A newspaper?

Is this the hill your choose to die on?

Sir, Ukraine is our ally, please do not besmirch our allies, why would they lie to us or about us ? I think Boris said a few things as well around that time. Why dont you google that "no you google it ferdia" zzz.

This post was edited by ferdia on Feb 22 2023 10:44am

I'm refuting your claim. Its not up to me to provide evidence for something I don't believe happened.

Very threadbare on your part.

Just to be clear: you are refuting my claim that Boris played any part in the peace talks being scuppered?

This post was edited by ferdia on Feb 22 2023 11:01am

I thought it was pretty clear?

I am refuting "that England is on record as advising them not to negotiate"

"On record" to me suggest something irrefutable. A newspaper article, is not irrefutable evidence.

welcome your thoughts on this then, its not long.

This post was edited by ferdia on Feb 22 2023 11:12am

Forgetting the usual diversion circle jerks:

What is Russia planning to do for the anniversary ?

The usual retard parade in full swing I see