d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1220722082209221022115001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 4,147
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 6.42
Warn: 10%
Feb 20 2023 07:19am
Quote (ferdia @ Feb 20 2023 09:07am)
compromise should not be!


Fair enough, you should be a diplomat Ferdia lol
Member
Posts: 56,410
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 578,963.53
Feb 20 2023 07:25am
Quote (JohnnyMcCoy @ Feb 20 2023 01:17pm)
nordstream 2 was a german project - It was a joint ownership project with multiple investers from multiple nations.

its already a joke that we are supposed to need permission to build something to supply our own country - its called "Interests" and "Security Concerns" Do what you like but dont stop on people's toes.

germany clearly is not an independent country - Germany IS an independant country.

all that being said, the pipeline WAS in the interest of the EU even if they dont admit it - Purely from the standpoint of price, yes. Viewed geopolitically it enters a grey area.

germany and its industrial output + exporting quality wares for relatively cheap prices are the only things keeping the EU alive - untrue, too vague, you would need to expand in order get an agreement of view.

and what do you need to provide these things? cheap energy - well there is no more cheap energy now. If your feeling liberal you can write your government a letter of protest.

surely under merkel the country became way too friendly - well if we were all friendly we would not be at war.

russia and the gas (not russia) crisis is a direct consequence of quitting nuclear power (fucking morons) - the cost of living crisis would still have occured if nuclear energy, it would just not have been as bad.

but you cant expect peak output from us and cut our energy at the same time - true


just being pedantic now.

This post was edited by ferdia on Feb 20 2023 07:28am
Member
Posts: 15,966
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Feb 20 2023 07:35am
Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Feb 20 2023 02:08pm)
Nobody said attack Russia.
They are no match for NATO conventionally, as proven by the performance of Russias miltary in Ukraine.


I didn't say "attack Russia" I said it's NOT POSSIBLE to attack Russia --> only option is to support Ukraine --> Russia is going to win which means NATO is going to lose.


Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Feb 20 2023 07:36am

Navalny fresh declaration about the war:

https://twitter.com/navalny/status/1627632098608644099

=> "Stop the aggression, end the war and withdraw all of its troops from Ukraine."

+ Biden surprise visit:



------------

Still fapping on NordStream ? Would be a pity.







Member
Posts: 56,410
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 578,963.53
Feb 20 2023 07:37am
Quote (Djunior @ Feb 20 2023 01:35pm)
I didn't say "attack Russia" I said it's NOT POSSIBLE to attack Russia --> only option is to support Ukraine --> Russia is going to win which means NATO is going to lose.


Nato won't lose as its not technically at war. The Western powers, and their allies, are supporting Ukraine duing this time of war. For Nato to be more directly involved would mean WW3. Therefore while we support Ukraine, if Ukraine loses its a blow to the western world but not technically the loss of Nato. If that makes logical sense.

TLDR: your right, if Russia wins its a loss for Nato.
Member
Posts: 4,147
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 6.42
Warn: 10%
Feb 20 2023 08:14am
Quote (ferdia @ Feb 20 2023 09:37am)
Nato won't lose as its not technically at war. The Western powers, and their allies, are supporting Ukraine duing this time of war. For Nato to be more directly involved would mean WW3. Therefore while we support Ukraine, if Ukraine loses its a blow to the western world but not technically the loss of Nato. If that makes logical sense.

TLDR: your right, if Russia wins its a loss for Nato.


I think because of the global spectacle the West has made of Ukraine, it could easily be seen by many other countries as a sea change moment if Russia were to "win".

That in my opinion is more dangerous to NATO than any military threat since we are talking about nuclear powers. Russia/China/whomever will never be able to challenge the West militarily because nukes exist, even if they had the conventional forces to do so, so the only real threats to the West are economic and internal, both which could be made much worse by a public loss of face. Depends how it was spun by governments and media of course but I feel like they have invested a lot more than just money and weapons Ukraine, their credibility is going to be tied to this one way or another, at least IMO.
Member
Posts: 18,211
Joined: Jul 15 2014
Gold: 107.77
Feb 20 2023 08:37am
Member
Posts: 20,044
Joined: Apr 13 2016
Gold: 32,397.50
Feb 20 2023 08:37am
NATO has pledged approximately 70 billion dollars of miltary and humanitarian aid for Ukraine.

Let's be generous and double that amount to include training and support before the 2022 special military illegal invasion.

So 140 billion spent on training and supporting Ukraine over almost a decade.

NATOs combined military spending for a single year is about 1.2 trillion dollars.

So it had cost NATO around 12% of its annual combined miltary budget.
Compare that with the cost to Russia.

It's not a popular opinion I know. But it is a reality.

If Russia does accomplish its strategic goals, whatever those actually are; It is not a certainty but it is Russias to lose at this point, it was not expected that Ukraine would resist this long or indefinitely.
Then will it be a geopolitical loss for NATO? Yes.
Will it be a public relations loss for NATO? Probably, yes.
Will it be a military loss for NATO? Far from it.

Anyone that thinks this will end in anything but a miltary "win" for NATO is out of their mind.

This post was edited by Prox1m1ty on Feb 20 2023 08:37am
Member
Posts: 4,621
Joined: Jan 30 2021
Gold: 751.50
Feb 20 2023 08:43am
Quote (ferdia @ Feb 20 2023 02:25pm)
just being pedantic now.


you clearly have no idea whats going on in europe
Banned
Posts: 53
Joined: Feb 20 2023
Gold: 0.00
Feb 20 2023 08:56am
Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Feb 20 2023 04:37pm)
NATO has pledged approximately 70 billion dollars of miltary and humanitarian aid for Ukraine.

Let's be generous and double that amount to include training and support before the 2022 special military illegal invasion.

So 140 billion spent on training and supporting Ukraine over almost a decade.

NATOs combined military spending for a single year is about 1.2 trillion dollars.

So it had cost NATO around 12% of its annual combined miltary budget.
Compare that with the cost to Russia.

It's not a popular opinion I know. But it is a reality.

If Russia does accomplish its strategic goals, whatever those actually are; It is not a certainty but it is Russias to lose at this point, it was not expected that Ukraine would resist this long or indefinitely.
Then will it be a geopolitical loss for NATO? Yes.
Will it be a public relations loss for NATO? Probably, yes.
Will it be a military loss for NATO? Far from it.

Anyone that thinks this will end in anything but a miltary "win" for NATO is out of their mind.


Evil cabal Russia will win
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1220722082209221022115001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll