Quote (ofthevoid @ Feb 6 2023 11:32pm)
Yes it's to support Ukrainians. Better than the alternative of the hundreds of videos surfacing where random Ukrainians in Stasi style are getting kidnaped in the streets to go to the front cuz democracy.
For example, 17 year old in this video, can go to university and have free will and if someone like you wants to prove their metal and show those Russians, you can feel free to do so.
https://twitter.com/AZgeopolitics/status/1622660027277352961I don't condone forcing anyone to fight. However you conveniently don't highlight that a majority of Ukrainians have chosen to fight.
The last thing they need are detractors complaining about the financial cost of supporting them.
Its correct to scrutinise what support is valid, but I see it as critical to create a detterent against Putin.
Appeasing Russia over Georgia and particularly Crimea was a mistake.
Look where it got us all?
Merkle damned Ukraine when she veto'd accession to NATO. Then she over exposed Germany's economy to Russia. And Scholz has been stalling on sending what Ukrainians say they need to defend themselves.
Ukraine asked for Leopards a year ago.
How many lives could have been saved by taking decisions to support Ukraine quicker?
It is a valid question.
The cost of appeasing aggression is inevitably higher than deterring aggression.