d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1212521262127212821295001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 4,147
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 6.42
Warn: 10%
Feb 3 2023 10:40am
Quote (Hamsterbaby @ Feb 3 2023 12:31pm)
Russia / China / USA ...... :lol:


Three reeking tanners overcome one Zhuge Liang. BRICS!!!!

:thumbsup:
Member
Posts: 20,044
Joined: Apr 13 2016
Gold: 32,397.50
Feb 3 2023 11:04am
Quote (ferdia @ Feb 3 2023 04:32pm)
No. -- OK
But are you saying the US installed the government in Ukraine? -- No. but note that i have answered the question which was framed by you (if framed another way I would have said Yes).
And if so, are you comparing that to the Russisn invasion of Ukraine? N/A (as No, above)

Would they be comparable "forces" to you? - Yes. from a wide lens this is comparable, while accepting the western model is softer (in most? views).

Another valid point I think is Russias propping up of Bashad in Syria. If you want to say that Russia appeased NATO. <- this is not a question.
Russia acts in its own self interest, rightly so. - As does the US.
But at the detriment of Ukrainians? Not right. - As does the US.

in summary this war that has been created can not be viewed as being beneficial to ukraine. If the arguement at the end of all this is "ukraine is now free" then the counter arguement would be "at what cost" and i do not agree with "any cost was worth freedom" when the end result could have been more gradually achieved without this massive loss of life.


So you don't think the US installed the Ukraine government.
But if they did, you think that is comparable to Russias invasion of Ukraine?
Right, ok.
Obviously disagree with that and would go as far to say as that is mental.

My original point was that appeasing Russia over Ukraine would be a terrible mistake.
Such as Crimea and 2014. You appease aggression and you get more aggression.
Member
Posts: 56,398
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 585,613.49
Feb 3 2023 11:08am
Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Feb 3 2023 05:04pm)
So you don't think the US installed the Ukraine government.
But if they did, you think that is comparable to Russias invasion of Ukraine?
Right, ok.
Obviously disagree with that and would go as far to say as that is mental.

My original point was that appeasing Russia over Ukraine would be a terrible mistake.
Such as Crimea and 2014. You appease aggression and you get more aggression.


the finer points:

it is my view that the US was directly involved in shaping or manouvering the Ukraine government.
where the end result is the taking of a chess piece (which is what ukraine is) then yes it comparable. In laymans terms, russia saw the piece as belonging to it, and the US captured it.
this is viewing the situation from a large step back. how is this position mental? surely you understand the concept of sphere of influence ?

Crimea was in Russia's sphere of influence and not yesterday, today or tomorrow will Russia countenance that position changing. To use your words, Russia will not appease the west in giving up Crimea. (i accept your position is "but crimea was never russia's in the first place" - i can accept your position but i dont have to agree with it).

This post was edited by ferdia on Feb 3 2023 11:09am
Member
Posts: 45,719
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 40,130.00
Feb 3 2023 11:11am
Quote (ferdia @ 4 Feb 2023 01:08)
the finer points:

it is my view that the US was directly involved in shaping or manouvering the Ukraine government.
where the end result is the taking of a chess piece (which is what ukraine is) then yes it comparable. In laymans terms, russia saw the piece as belonging to it, and the US captured it.
this is viewing the situation from a large step back. how is this position mental? surely you understand the concept of sphere of influence ?

Crimea was in Russia's sphere of influence and not yesterday, today or tomorrow will Russia countenance that position changing. To use your words, Russia will not appease the west in giving up Crimea. (i accept your position is "but crimea was never russia's in the first place" - i can accept your position but i dont have to agree with it).


I don't think he understand.....
Member
Posts: 56,398
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 585,613.49
Feb 3 2023 11:13am
Quote (Hamsterbaby @ Feb 3 2023 05:11pm)
I don't think he understand.....


lets see his response. dont jump to conclusions.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Feb 3 2023 11:14am
How surprising that countries who endured the soviet oppression want to boycott Olympics if Russian athletes are participating, even under neutral flag. Estonia, Lithuania...
IMHO If I had to take a side i would refuse Russian athletes because of the doping history.

https://www.reuters.com/article/sport-doping-russia-timeline-idUSKBN28R2HR
Not sure they can correct themselves.

Quote (ferdia @ 3 Feb 2023 18:08)
the finer points:

it is my view that the US was directly involved in shaping or manouvering the Ukraine government.
where the end result is the taking of a chess piece (which is what ukraine is) then yes it comparable. In laymans terms, russia saw the piece as belonging to it, and the US captured it.
this is viewing the situation from a large step back. how is this position mental? surely you understand the concept of sphere of influence ?

Crimea was in Russia's sphere of influence and not yesterday, today or tomorrow will Russia countenance that position changing. To use your words, Russia will not appease the west in giving up Crimea. (i accept your position is "but crimea was never russia's in the first place" - i can accept your position but i dont have to agree with it).


They want all Ukraine, by force. Not sure what you can't understand here. Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, Syria ... LOL... Such a TRASH.

This post was edited by Meanwhile on Feb 3 2023 11:16am
Member
Posts: 45,719
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 40,130.00
Feb 3 2023 11:16am
Quote (ferdia @ 4 Feb 2023 01:13)
lets see his response. dont jump to conclusions.


He is as sharp as a marble.
Member
Posts: 56,398
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 585,613.49
Feb 3 2023 11:18am
Quote (Meanwhile @ Feb 3 2023 05:14pm)
How surprising that countries who endured the soviet oppression want to boycott Olympics if Russian athletes are participating, even under neutral flag. Estonia, Lithuania...
IMHO If I had to take a side i would refuse Russian athletes because of the doping history.

https://www.reuters.com/article/sport-doping-russia-timeline-idUSKBN28R2HR
Not sure they can correct themselves.



They want all Ukraine, by force. Not sure what you can't understand here. Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, Syria ... LOL... Such a TRASH.


Russia does not appear to want all of Ukraine, just half of it.
Where do you see me not understanding something, and I will give you my view
Your not wrong re: those countries being messed up.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Feb 3 2023 11:25am
Quote (ferdia @ 3 Feb 2023 18:18)
Russia does not appear to want all of Ukraine, just half of it.
Where do you see me not understanding something, and I will give you my view
Your not wrong re: those countries being messed up.


Murdering the actual government, all political opponents / people criticizing Russia, then put a puppet in charge. Next step is let it slowly join back the "good old" USSR/Empire.
Sorry Ferdia but Putin want ALL Ukraine... Moldavia too... After that: to continue to destroy nearby democracies like they tried to do with Ukraine.

This post was edited by Meanwhile on Feb 3 2023 11:27am
Member
Posts: 56,398
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 585,613.49
Feb 3 2023 11:27am
Quote (Meanwhile @ Feb 3 2023 05:25pm)
Murdering the actual government, all political opposition, then put a puppet in charge. Next step is let it slowly join back the "good old" USSR/Empire.
Sorry Ferdia but Putin want ALL Ukraine... Moldavia too... After that: to continue to destroy nearby democracies like they tried to do with Ukraine.


this is your opinion, this is also a common widespread opinion. i am not ignoring this viewpoint, i just dont share it. The idea of Ukraine first, eastern europe next - where is this logic coming from ?
remember putin has been in power for decades now. do you not question, why now and not before 2014 ?

This post was edited by ferdia on Feb 3 2023 11:28am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1212521262127212821295001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll