Quote (Prox1m1ty @ Feb 3 2023 03:52pm)
No.
But are you saying the US installed the government in Ukraine?
And if so, are you comparing that to the Russisn invasion of Ukraine?
Would they be comparable "forces" to you?
Another valid point I think is Russias propping up of Bashad in Syria. If you want to say that Russia appeased NATO.
Russia acts in its own self interest, rightly so.
But at the detriment of Ukrainians? Not right.
No. -- OK
But are you saying the US installed the government in Ukraine? -- No. but note that i have answered the question which was framed by you (if framed another way I would have said Yes).
And if so, are you comparing that to the Russisn invasion of Ukraine? N/A (as No, above)
Would they be comparable "forces" to you? - Yes. from a wide lens this is comparable, while accepting the western model is softer (in most? views).
Another valid point I think is Russias propping up of Bashad in Syria. If you want to say that Russia appeased NATO. <- this is not a question.
Russia acts in its own self interest, rightly so. - As does the US.
But at the detriment of Ukrainians? Not right. - As does the US.
in summary this war that has been created can not be viewed as being beneficial to ukraine. If the arguement at the end of all this is "ukraine is now free" then the counter arguement would be "at what cost" and i do not agree with "any cost was worth freedom" when the end result could have been more gradually achieved without this massive loss of life.
This post was edited by ferdia on Feb 3 2023 10:35am