lol you claim to do extensive digging


they blm/antifa were in the capital before the trumpers speech was finished, hes not filming trumpers

6TH ATTEMPT AT UPLOADING my VIDEO on GARBAGE TECH BITCHUTE after 5 FAILED ATTEMPTS
https://www.bitchute.com/video/TcVIw2TTDbTK/

also look whos getting thrown under the bus. what happens in fascism when your not needed any more.

MEDIA BLACKOUT! Look Who Just SWARMED The DC Capitol The Media Doesn’t Want You To See
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zg2Tf4IPW6A/

This post was edited by TiStuff on Jan 17 2021 10:15pm

BOOM! Dem Impeachment Show DASHED To Pieces After GOP Rep EXPLODES with BRUTAL House Floor Speech
https://www.bitchute.com/video/eFfRTuwHSN4/

With titles like that, how do you expect this website to have any credibility?

Anyway, I've decided to humor you and watch the video. She says she opposes the impeachment, and then goes on a whataboutism rant that essentially comes down to "there were looters during BLM, so opposing this capitol invasion is hypocritical". Nothing to defend any of Trump's actions.

So yeah, if you wonder why people find your sources pathetic, this is why: they are pathetic.

This post was edited by Leevee on Jan 18 2021 01:12am

this might be the first time some one watched the content and offered a reasoned argument. So let me respond with a counter argument.
first bitchute is just a platform. The dont make titles or content. So your problem with the title should be directed at the content maker. I have a tendency to ignore titles because I want to focus on content. Make no mistake titles can have all kinds of problems.
the content of this vid starts from 01:00- 02:12

"She says she opposes the impeachment"
(yes?)

"whataboutism "
(a bllchit tatic if your going to point a finger at some one you better not have a reason to have a finger pointed back at you.)

""there were looters during BLM, so opposing this capitol invasion is hypocritical"
(and violence and murdering and burning for years, while the left supported it with zero condemnation. yes that would make them hypocrites, frauds of the highest order.

"Nothing to defend any of Trump's actions"
(its a one minute speech, she covers what she thinks is most important in one minute.)

"So yeah, if you wonder why people find your sources pathetic, this is why: they are pathetic"
(and I say you failed to show it was "pathetic". ....................... thanks for watching, that was much more reasonable than what usually happens)

so tell me? what do you think this administration has to offer the nation? Are they going to let up on e small business or are they going to continue to crush them so big corporate numbers can keep going up?
more mask mandates? and race grifting?

he won in a landslide
despite huge efforts to disenfranchise dem voters
suppress the vote in dem areas
and throw out legally cast mail in ballots because they hurt their chances
it looks like bait
because the truth hurts

Impeachment is for trying to strong arm the georgia sec of state to cheat as evidenced by the recorded phone call released, and encouraging his followers to attack Congress so he could make calls to people in congress demanding they overturn the election, and not calling his followers off until it failed.

Neither of these are stretches of the truth, they are objectively recorded events. You have his speeches leading up to the storming and you have records of calls to senators and Congress men and women who were there.

I know you need safe havens for racist and loli memes still, i get you have needs too. Now come to this guy's defense and make excuses like a battered wives again.

Also Trump should pardon his followers.

This post was edited by Skinned on Jan 18 2021 07:28am

That's not how justice works. If you believe the Dems did something wrong, then your party should be suing them. If the Republicans do something wrong, Dems should take action regardless of whatever blood they have on their own hands.



You can play this game ad nauseam. You say Democrats support BLM violence, so I can just counter this again by saying that Republicans support police violence against minorities.
This is exactly why I say that it is not an argument. She's saying that the Democrats are trash (and I don't even disagree with that), but she's not giving any reason to Trump's own actions.



She had one minute and decided to fill it with fallacies. That's her loss.



That's just because you follow the same logical fallacies as this speecher does.

Since it will have been 2 weeks when the senate reconvenes I wonder if trump will release his healthcare plan.

Sheep