Quote (ofthevoid @ May 2 2019 11:29am)
I live in the inner city where a good portion of the people don’t work or work relatively little and there’s no wonderful gardens in sight tbh. Many of the houses are dilapidated so the point that more free time will just be replaced by other type of work doesn’t always hold.
there are a lot of emerging programs for inner city gardening. community raised bed gardens. some cities like Detroit, iirc, are doing it in abandoned industrial areas. but most people can fill their vegetable needs with just a 3' x 5' balcony. our society has just lost most of it's desire to do that. (largely due to working too much and food being too convenient)
Quote
Tbh I don’t really understand why you’re so adamant in calling people stupid that simply have a different opinion on this subject. Like i said both your point on automation and his point on work being good are valid so why go agro?
his point on work is that UBI kills motivation and stops people from working, which is an ignorant mindset to have. i will continue to call people stupid that operate on strawman arguments and falsehoods. i also call people taking Yang's 1000$/month/person literally stupid. but i can try to be more balanced in who i call stupid.
Quote
Just curious, let’s say in 30 years Labor force participation rate is like 40% due to automation. Let’s say everyone is getting the 1k or possibly more. Would you be for or against some top-down “work” creation by govt?
newdeal type local cleanup programs could be a good idea generally. and govt intervention in sector collapses could always be a good idea. re-training for truck drivers or coal miners for example, as compared to simply propping up solar markets and letting the shit work itself out. do i think the govt should be overly concerned with creating labor tho, not really. maybe in the way of reforming education for a new dawn of less labor, perhaps more emphasis on self reliance.
This post was edited by thesnipa on May 2 2019 11:35am