So the friend of the police said one thing in the friend of the family said the other. This is why I said the coroner's report is not gospel and is not treated as such in Court

There ya go again. FOUR coroners said the same thing. The 5th, a friend of the family disagreed.

You sure you're majoring in.. doctor? You'd think you would know that the coroner has the last word.


/e I mean it's much easier to diagnose things, when you're not required to put the body back together again. ^^

This post was edited by Ghot on Jun 11 2020 06:58pm

Don't call it a grave, it's the future you chose.

Four coroners said what, specifically?

It's already been posted bro.
No, I don't remember where. I mean it was on PaRD, but the way people get off topic these days... who knows.

I have a feeling that most Americans are not okay with the father of this country being defaced. Using her logic, it would be impossible to venerate ANYONE. But statues that went up specifically to intimidate black people? Yea, those can go and I think most Americans feel the same way.

Out here, I'd say the most influential figure is Father Junipero Serra. He was instrumental in teaching Catholicism to the savage people who once ruled these lands. Anyone who tries to take away his accomplishments should be put to the sword.

83 pages. And I ask, because I'm pretty sure the coroners didn't say "heart attack induced by drug use."

That's a lie and ofc its the deplorables saying it.

So the coroner has the last word even though the coroners disagree.

Yep, that's about your level of understanding

Unfortunately the bar for innocence has been set.

This is entirely consistent with how the 1619 project views history. Through those lens, it's probably necessary that we remove Washington's statue, as he is not only emblematic, but actively complicit in a history of racial oppression.

We can dismiss Washington for the same reason that Netflix has removed Gone with the Wind. It is impossible to venerate history if it does not specifically work to end oppression (specifically and exclusively racial oppression), as to be silent is to be complicit. and by venerating Washington we are actively ignoring or excusing his positions on slavery. This is the natural consequence of approaching history through a retroactive and simplistic moral lens.