d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1203020312032203320345001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 19,309
Joined: Feb 24 2018
Gold: 9,765.50
Jan 23 2023 11:19am
Quote (Goomshill @ Jan 23 2023 06:10pm)
Correct me if I got my timeline wrong but weren't they already besieging the ethnic Russian regions for 5 years before zelensky was elected? And Russias little green men were already in that war just as long. As far as I've seen, Zelensky is just a figurehead for a puppet regime, the CIA isnt even hiding it, look what theyre doing this week


Yes, but on the outside in Ukraine he was the person to bring peace. Ukrainians, Russian speaking and normal ones alike, never wanted to be a part of Russia, didn't want any war and didn't give two fucks about Crimea either. They just wanted peace and prosperity.
Member
Posts: 15,965
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Jan 23 2023 12:11pm
Quote (Meanwhile @ Jan 23 2023 05:43pm)
Who would want to side with Putin's regime anyway... Seriously, who ? ^_^


I'm not arguing against that, I get that Ukraine thinks it's better off siding with the EU / NATO but the point is that it's neighbor isn't going to let it happen for reasons that were discussed here for over 2000 pages.

So let me ask YOU a question:

Why would you make Ukraine wage war against a country like Russia, knowing all too well how Russia is going to react?

This post was edited by Djunior on Jan 23 2023 12:28pm
Member
Posts: 15,965
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Jan 23 2023 12:28pm
Quote (ferdia @ Jan 23 2023 05:39pm)
^Djunior babun1024 has clinically highlighted the reason why Zelensky was elected. Now, I accept you may not be agreeable however I would urge you to try reason when debating here, noting reason is the safest course.


The Zelensky regime is 100% pro EU / NATO / West, there's no doubt about it and what I said was accurate. EU did pay Ukraine's gas bills (billions worth) and offered Ukraine a free trade deal and no doubt you know that NATO welcomed future Ukrainian membership.

At this point the Ukrainian regime has no other option whatsoever cuz Russia wants their heads therefore Washington / Brussels are now in full control of Ukraine although the West will never admit that.

If the West decides to stop supporting Ukraine financially / militarily / intelligence, then it's all over for Ukraine very quickly.

This post was edited by Djunior on Jan 23 2023 12:30pm
Member
Posts: 56,404
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 588,503.49
Jan 23 2023 12:30pm
Quote (Djunior @ Jan 23 2023 06:28pm)
The Zelensky regime is 100% pro EU / NATO / West, there's no doubt about it and what I said was accurate. EU did pay Ukraine's gas bills (billions worth) and offered Ukraine a free trade deal and no doubt you know that NATO welcomed future Ukrainian membership.

At this point Ukraine has no other option whatsoever cuz Russia wants their heads therefore Washington / Brussels are now in full control of Ukraine although the West will never admit that.

If the West decides to stop supporting Ukraine financially / militarily / intelligence, then it's all over for Ukraine very quickly.


no but what i mean is, its not that he was pro EU / NATO / West that got him elected, but rather he was elected on a mandate of reconciliation. sorry i was trying to help you here.

This post was edited by ferdia on Jan 23 2023 12:31pm
Member
Posts: 15,965
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Jan 23 2023 12:43pm
Quote (ferdia @ Jan 23 2023 07:30pm)
no but what i mean is, its not that he was pro EU / NATO / West that got him elected, but rather he was elected on a mandate of reconciliation. sorry i was trying to help you here.


If he wasn't pro-EU before he was elected and actually wanted peace then it's weird that he made a 180, I don't know what happened there but if that was the case I guess there was significant pressure (from the West?)
Member
Posts: 56,404
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 588,503.49
Jan 23 2023 12:46pm
Quote (Djunior @ Jan 23 2023 06:43pm)
If he wasn't pro-EU before he was elected and actually wanted peace then it's weird that he made a 180, I don't know what happened there but if that was the case I guess there was significant pressure (from the West?)


he was pro western, that was elected on a mandate of peace and reconciliation.
dont harp about his pro western mindset, its not hard to be pro western ok.
Member
Posts: 15,965
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Jan 23 2023 01:05pm
Quote (ferdia @ Jan 23 2023 07:46pm)
he was pro western, that was elected on a mandate of peace and reconciliation.
dont harp about his pro western mindset, its not hard to be pro western ok.


You got a reliable source?

The only thing I find is mention that one of his goals was "to bring the war to an end" and I can't find much more
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jan 23 2023 01:07pm
Quote (Djunior @ 23 Jan 2023 18:11)
I'm not arguing against that, I get that Ukraine thinks it's better off siding with the EU / NATO but the point is that it's neighbor isn't going to let it happen for reasons that were discussed here for over 2000 pages.

So let me ask YOU a question:

Why would you make Ukraine wage war against a country like Russia, knowing all too well how Russia is going to react?


Getting rid of something is not doing something against it: Russia always was the agressor.

It was Ukraine's choice and well justified to liberate itself. Big history as a proof. Helping them is fine on my eyes and on the eyes of the vast majority of europeans.
Russia also super toxic since 2 decades, has to stop.

Who can defend russian manners anyway....
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Jan 23 2023 01:15pm
Quote (babun1024 @ 23 Jan 2023 13:24)
Getting personal is the first sign you're lost an argument, cutie pie. I agree fully Ukraine is 100% entitled to retake their territory. You could even make one of those useless polls: I'd vote for Ukraine. However, it depends on the way how Russia sees this. We don't coexist on a parallel realm. If they see it as a declaration of war oursides from their crude perspective we'd have to be prepared for improper retaliation because they can't face NATO in conventional ways. I am not like you. I am not a person to f around and find out later. I don't think Leopards are going to change the tide of the war, that's the new media hype. The way to go against Russia is Vietnam, Afghanistan etc. to force them to abandon occupied territories. I'm 100% behind all help to them leading into that direction. The problem is to make guerilla tactics successful you need support form the local population. Do you see the point here? The lands Russia has taken from Ukraine so far are mostly populated by Russian speaking people. Retaking them by unconventional means would be nigh impossible. Even more so if Russia manages to indoctrinate the next generation. That's why Ukraine is so desperate in Donbas. Contrary to Crimea, which holds little real importance for Ukraine, Donbas is a very important part of their economy.

Again, you interpreted my post the way you wanted from your own perspective, jerked off to that by yourself and blame me for being a categorical person in a very one sided categorical way of your own :lol:

Again, elaborate with facts why Crimea is so important for Ukraine? Please refrain from this type of argumentation chain:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAqIJZeeXEc

Stop spewing Russian propaganda. No one cares who historically a country belonged to. Americas (both) belonged to native Americans then. GTFO from your country :lol:


i honestly don't know what you want to hear from me there. i feel like asking me to elaborate HOW crimea is historically, strategically, economically, culturally, ideologically, and in any other imaginable way important to ukraine is such a bad faith angle. that's like asking "how is schleswig-holstein important to germany? why not just give it to denmark?".

regarding the leopards: i said i'm undecided and think military experts should make that evaluation. you reject the idea of sending them outright, but hilariously your "reason" suddenly switched from the ludicrous notion that "it would enable ukraine to conquer (parts of) russia" (something ukraine NEVER aspired, and would have no chance of pulling off in the first place - not that it made any strategic sense to begin with) to "it wouldn't change anything".
it certainly looks like you are the one who has a certain conclusion in mind (no leopards), and tries every narrative in the book to justify it, no matter how obviously ridiculous or contradicting your previous "argument", lol.

regarding your "vietnam" angle: ukraine is NOT in a similar position. yes, the russian army has a significant material and personnel advantage and is operating on foreign soil. yes, they have air superiority. but there are many, very crucial differences that make such an approach a really silly and frankly disgusting suggestion:

- ukraine is technologically and structurally on the same level as russia.
- this is a war between neighbouring countries, not an overseas campaign in a remote corner of the world. it is russia's IDEAL battlefield if you look at already existing supply infrastructure.
- russia does NOT have a type of government in which a war weary, unhappy population could swing an election. pootin is a de facto dictator, who brutally cracks down on any domestic opposition.
- ukraine is understandably NOT at a point where they are willing to just let russia bomb their whole country back to the stone age while hiding underground and fatiguing the homesick occupiers.

in reality, it'd just allow russia to quickly take control of critical infrastructure. all russia would have left to do is smoke out the last resisting forces, which would be cut off any supplies then, commit another happy little genocide on those still openly opposing their new rulers, and ukraine would be de facto theirs. honestly, the more you share, the harder it becomes to take you seriously tbh.

This post was edited by fender on Jan 23 2023 01:22pm
Member
Posts: 15,965
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Jan 23 2023 01:22pm
Quote (Meanwhile @ Jan 23 2023 08:07pm)
Getting rid of something is not doing something against it: Russia always was the agressor.

It was Ukraine's choice and well justified to liberate itself. Big history as a proof. Helping them is fine on my eyes and on the eyes of the vast majority of europeans.
Russia also super toxic since 2 decades, has to stop.

Who can defend russian manners anyway....


First bolded: They were always were the aggressor? Correction: There was always a struggle between East and West and after 1991 Russia didn't do much at all up to 2008 (when NATO basically forced Russia to act).

So second bolded is false.

Third bolded: There you go, that's what you're all about here, 2000 pages and counting, lol. You're just regurgitating the "Russia bad" narrative fed to you by MSM.

Now Russia said fuck it and has come out to fight. And Ukraine is getting wrecked. So much win huh

Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1203020312032203320345001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll