It likely does.


Terrorist
a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

Which also makes Antifa and BLM terrorists if you apply the above definition to some of the rallies that have been held. BLM less so but to say they have not also engaged in altering political aims would just be a lie. Two wrongs don't make a right. But I am sure the left would scream all day if you classified BLM as terrorists.

This post was edited by wesley123 on Aug 16 2017 02:16pm

Sounds reasonable. I agree

Oh I see. So Timothy McVeigh was just boys being boys. There was violence on the other side.

But I digress. Section 802 of USA PATRIOT wasn't in effect until the early 2000s. So I guess good old Tim wasn't a terrorist at all. But the neo-Nazis at this rally certainly were, by the very definition of U.S. law, which was expanded to include domestic in October of 2001.

This post was edited by inkanddagger on Aug 16 2017 02:48pm

it's not terrorism, it's just locker room behaviour. everybody does it, stop being such snowflakes...

these mental gymnastics you're performing in order to avoid a buzzword is some serious cuck snowflake beta material.

trump literally called the guy a terrorist not sure why this went a page + of discussion, just watch the video

And then minimized it by blaming peace activists for singing violent Kumbaya in the vicinity of peaceful Nazis with love torches and kindness shields and benevolence-spreading automobiles.

This post was edited by inkanddagger on Aug 16 2017 04:23pm

your hallucination is noted

The government provided a definition of domestic terrorism. It provides no enforceable mechanism to prosecute, just to investigate. It ambiguously gives the option to seize assets, which has never been used, because it would be found unconstitutional.
This is not an unimportant nuance. I already pointed it out in my last post. If Jeff Sessions went to court to prosecute this driver on charges of "domestic terrorism", the first judge he met would toss the case out because that charge doesn't even exist.

Timothy McVeigh was not convicted on terrorism charges. He was convicted of "conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction, use of a weapon of mass destruction, destruction with the use of explosives and eight counts of first-degree murder"
McVeigh was a terrorist by colloquial definition and ex post facto PATRIOT act definition. He was not, however, a terrorist under legal definition.

Hes faking it