Quote (SBD @ 17 Sep 2020 02:05)
Partnerships exist all over the place. Worker owned coops are typically to large to incentivze properly. Why would I want to split wealth when I can earn more in a proper structured partnership arrangement with a proper payout formula. Id much rather be an equity partner.
It's like coop businesses fuck the trivial amount you get on your t5 every year when it costs more to shop there and the amount returned does not even begin to match the difference paid by shopping there.
I guess worker owned coop would have some more deep tax cuts, simply.
Quote (thundercock @ 17 Sep 2020 02:08)
Oh these policies don't have a chance in hell of passing in America. That wasn't the argument. I was arguing that Bernie and AOC are left, even by European standards. The more power they get, the more likely we'll move towards Communism/socialism. Still doesn't have a chance of happening.
I don't have a problem with worker owned cooperatives existing. If workers want to band their capital together and own a company, that's fine. It's sort of a mix between Marxism and capitalism.
Conceding will be done on both sides. In France we have moderated left, frank left, and extrem left.
Second one happened few times in the past, typical moments are 1936 or 1981... Those are the typical "rose socialists" and introduced key welfare stuff (and paid vacations). Education. Health. nb: and free stuff.
Communism never happened: it's just too violent, too deep. Your AOC is american version of "rose socialists", will won elections at next depression maybe.
McCarthyism PTSD.
Hmm well, this still could escalate quickly. With the rise of populism and social networks we have a mix of 2&3 atm.
This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Sep 16 2020 06:34pm