d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Jan 6 Committee Thread
Prev1187188189190191225Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 3,908
Joined: Jun 20 2022
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Oct 24 2022 12:11am
Quote (theCrossbones @ Oct 23 2022 11:39pm)
You still skipped most of the points



Okay so? The secret service are the ones who said the limo thing didn’t happen. Almost immediately after came out and said basically, “lol no”. It was a former aide to trump who told the story. She said it was hearsay.

Hillary is irrelevant.

Trumps daughter is irrelevant.

My point still stands they denied any Republican who would bring actual bipartisanship and instead placed Cheney and claimed bipartisanship.
Member
Posts: 3,908
Joined: Jun 20 2022
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Oct 24 2022 06:14am
Kari lake is fantastic.

Speaking of “election deniers” :rofl:



Member
Posts: 50,721
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 4,861.00
Oct 24 2022 10:47am
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/24/supreme-court-justice-clarence-thomas-temporarily-blocks-sen-grahams-subpoena-from-georgia-grand-jury.html

Democrats are really going all-out on blowing up the checks and balances and separation of powers in America in a way tenfold more dangerous than the previous envelop pushing that always backfired on them when Republicans inevitably did the same. Its a clear cut case, no liability can be attached to the conduct and speech of congressmen during their legislative activity. Its right there in the constitution in Article I, Section 6, Clause 1. Democrats and judicial activists beholden to them can't go out and try to pick apart every statement made by a sitting member of congress while in session and carve out an exception for every sentence as to whether its protected or not. The founding fathers were pretty explicitly clear in telling anyone attempting that to fuck right off. What were they supposed to do, put in an extra super special safeguard in the language of D&D autists and say congressmen and all activities within a 25 foot radius of them for a duration of 4D6 turns shall be immunized?

C'mon, Lindsey Graham should not be the victim in anyone's story
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Oct 24 2022 11:19am
Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 24 2022 11:47am)
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/24/supreme-court-justice-clarence-thomas-temporarily-blocks-sen-grahams-subpoena-from-georgia-grand-jury.html

Democrats are really going all-out on blowing up the checks and balances and separation of powers in America in a way tenfold more dangerous than the previous envelop pushing that always backfired on them when Republicans inevitably did the same. Its a clear cut case, no liability can be attached to the conduct and speech of congressmen during their legislative activity. Its right there in the constitution in Article I, Section 6, Clause 1. Democrats and judicial activists beholden to them can't go out and try to pick apart every statement made by a sitting member of congress while in session and carve out an exception for every sentence as to whether its protected or not. The founding fathers were pretty explicitly clear in telling anyone attempting that to fuck right off. What were they supposed to do, put in an extra super special safeguard in the language of D&D autists and say congressmen and all activities within a 25 foot radius of them for a duration of 4D6 turns shall be immunized?

C'mon, Lindsey Graham should not be the victim in anyone's story


Because there is absolutely no possible conflict of interest with Thomas getting involved in any case involving J6. None whatsoever.

Also, Article I, section 6, clause 1 specifically has this exception:

Quote
They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace


The Georgia case is a criminal one, not civil.

This post was edited by Surfpunk on Oct 24 2022 11:20am
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Oct 24 2022 05:07pm
Quote (YeeHaw @ Oct 23 2022 11:11pm)
Okay so? The secret service are the ones who said the limo thing didn’t happen. Almost immediately after came out and said basically, “lol no”. It was a former aide to trump who told the story. She said it was hearsay.

Hillary is irrelevant.

Trumps daughter is irrelevant.

My point still stands they denied any Republican who would bring actual bipartisanship and instead placed Cheney and claimed bipartisanship.



Your still dodging the points. Hillary is relevant. She was stand up enough to go testify in front of ALL R. Trump is a coward. If he’s not guilty go testify. Grandma did . So Ivanka was operating in a govt capacity. Yes because trump hired his family like some 3rd world country. She agrees there was no fraud. Cheney is a life long conservative. So because she disagrees with MAGA she’s not a R. Lol got it
Member
Posts: 3,908
Joined: Jun 20 2022
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Oct 24 2022 06:14pm
Quote (theCrossbones @ Oct 24 2022 06:07pm)
Your still dodging the points. Hillary is relevant. She was stand up enough to go testify in front of ALL R. Trump is a coward. If he’s not guilty go testify. Grandma did . So Ivanka was operating in a govt capacity. Yes because trump hired his family like some 3rd world country. She agrees there was no fraud. Cheney is a life long conservative. So because she disagrees with MAGA she’s not a R. Lol got it



Hillary was being investigated for things that she did. She as in Hillary did them. Hillary did things and had to say what she did. She did the things. Hillary.


Trump is being “investigated” for things other people did. He gave a speech and went home. The riot started miles away when he began his speech. There is no rational way to say he incited the riot.

This has been an absolute joke from the beginning. It is sad you are even entertaining this as important. Anybody with half an ounce of objectivity can see through this for what it is. I am sorry you are so blinded by tribal hatred you cannot.
Member
Posts: 9,112
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.01
Oct 24 2022 06:20pm
Quote (theCrossbones @ Oct 24 2022 06:07pm)
Your still dodging the points. Hillary is relevant. She was stand up enough to go testify in front of ALL R. Trump is a coward. If he’s not guilty go testify. Grandma did . So Ivanka was operating in a govt capacity. Yes because trump hired his family like some 3rd world country. She agrees there was no fraud. Cheney is a life long conservative. So because she disagrees with MAGA she’s not a R. Lol got it


Cheney lost her base, she is a R with near zero constituent support within her own jurisdiction. If power comes from the people as founders worded it, then Cheney is indeed irrelevant or misrepresenting her constituents. An artifact of another era of R, and wholy out of touch with base principles of a representative government.

This post was edited by RedFromWinter on Oct 24 2022 06:21pm
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Oct 24 2022 07:55pm
Quote (RedFromWinter @ Oct 24 2022 05:20pm)
Cheney lost her base, she is a R with near zero constituent support within her own jurisdiction. If power comes from the people as founders worded it, then Cheney is indeed irrelevant or misrepresenting her constituents. An artifact of another era of R, and wholy out of touch with base principles of a representative government.



If she would of supported trumps lies. She would of won in a landslide.
NOTHING else changed. She should of lied until she got re elected. Lol
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Oct 24 2022 07:56pm
Quote (YeeHaw @ Oct 24 2022 05:14pm)
Hillary was being investigated for things that she did. She as in Hillary did them. Hillary did things and had to say what she did. She did the things. Hillary.


Trump is being “investigated” for things other people did. He gave a speech and went home. The riot started miles away when he began his speech. There is no rational way to say he incited the riot.

This has been an absolute joke from the beginning. It is sad you are even entertaining this as important. Anybody with half an ounce of objectivity can see through this for what it is. I am sorry you are so blinded by tribal hatred you cannot.



Um no. And you call me tribal. Lol pathetic
Member
Posts: 9,112
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.01
Oct 24 2022 08:05pm
Quote (theCrossbones @ Oct 24 2022 08:55pm)
If she would of supported trumps lies. She would of won in a landslide.
NOTHING else changed. She should of lied until she got re elected. Lol


Of course she could have lied to stay in, but she is beholden to serving and representing the deep state status quo interests even as they diverge from her constituents.. Why else would she be on committee and so eager to flip party and cast aside those whom she is charged with representing? She doesn't even need to win office, she is in the good ole boy's club and will be taken care of as she commits political Seppuku.

She is a life long deep state rep, not a true conservative.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1187188189190191225Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll