d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev11841851861871885001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 4,621
Joined: Jan 30 2021
Gold: 751.50
Mar 15 2022 05:35pm
Quote (ferdia @ Mar 16 2022 12:16am)
regional security could have been achieved with de-escalation - i.e. the US adhering to Russia's red lines and saying no to Nato+Ukraine.
regional security could have been achieved with phased normalisation after the US adhered to Russia's red lines. i.e. Hey lets dial it back we acknowledge we went a bit overboard here.
and provided Ukraine was not invited into a trade deal with the EU, that would also not have caused an issue. To be honest I think given enough time this could have let slide.

The EU and Nato should have just waited for Putin to die of old age and then invited Ukraine into Nato and EU and Trade etc etc.

the only problem with all that is that (to my understanding) its your view that America was right to ignore Russia's red lines, America was right not to seek phased de-escalation and normalisation and the EU still wants Ukraine as does Nato. i.e. your entire logic is based on Russia backing down (before invading) rather then the west backing down (before Russia's invasion). You have not said how the west could alleviate Putin's fears or what Putin could have done differently. Look I get it, he invaded Ukraine, he's the bad guy, but as we have said so many many times, if Cuba had missiles or if Canada went into a strategic military alliance with China and lined the US border with missiles (hey defensive only we swear) there is no way that America would or should let that stand, and yes they would then be considered the bad guys, but wait, no china is the enemy, so canada would be seen as the enemy. So really now, what other option did putin have to stop Ukraine from joining Nato and the EU and having missiles aimed at Russia.


you are talking to fenderp, that dipshit is constantly not even trying to have a discussion, everything not agreeing with him is propaganda, hack, bot, whatever, while insulting you directly or via some passive aggressiveness like a fucking rat

dont even bother, you could make 100% pro west/nato posts from now on and probably be called putins double agent or so
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Mar 15 2022 05:36pm
ukraine was a LONG way from joining either NATO or the EU. the notion that it's the west's job to alleviate pootin's alleged (and entirely irrational, if even real) fears is absurd. russia invaded and occupied ukraine, they were the aggressor since 2014. as regional hegemon, they have the power to de-escalate and create stability. russia is russia. ukraine is a different country. it is not pootin's right to determine ukraine's destiny, it's exclusively the ukrainian population's right. if they want to join NATO, they have the right to apply for it. how difficult is that to understand?
Member
Posts: 56,268
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,205.03
Mar 15 2022 05:36pm
a nuance - de-escalation, before Russia invaded. I dont think any de-escalation can happen over the next few weeks or so, noting, again, regardless of what both sides are saying re: talks -- from what I have read, the sides Ukraine vs Russia AND West vs Russia are so far apart as to make de-escalation right now impossible. I am not looking at this exclusively from Putin's perspective, so to reiterate:

The West wants a trade deal with the Ukraine, they are also very happy to let Ukraine into the EU and Nato (accept this does not happen overnight and takes years).
Ukraine wants a trade deal with the West. they are also very happy to be let into the EU and Nato (accept this does not happen overnight and takes years).
Putin (read: Russia) was happy for Ukraine to do its own thing, provided it did not become his enemy. Talk and movements re: Trade Deal, EU, Nato and political movements in Ukraine made him see Ukraine as a potential enemy on his doorstep.

The West and Russia discussed Russia's concerns. The West did not agree with Russia and did not acknowledge Russia's red lines. The talks failed. Russia invaded.

If you disagree with any of that let me know. stating facts is not the same thing as being a war apologist.

This post was edited by ferdia on Mar 15 2022 05:41pm
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Mar 15 2022 05:39pm
Quote (dro94 @ 16 Mar 2022 00:30)
I edited my post shortly after to clarify I deliberately didn't factor in NATO


fair enough, then it's true. even though russia's military was apparently criminally overrated and severely eroded by corruption, they'd still have the upper hand. almost like it's the point of nukes and defensive alliances that not every country has to maintain massive standing armies any more...

€dit: let's be real though, picking germany is a bit misleading. we might be the dominant economic power, but our armed forces are famously useless these days. i'd wager the frenchies or the brits could give the russians a real run for their money in such a scenario, considering how long it takes them to deal with ukraine...

This post was edited by fender on Mar 15 2022 05:45pm
Member
Posts: 56,268
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,205.03
Mar 15 2022 05:42pm
here let me helpfully prevent you from double posting, again. but also ~

Quote (JohnnyMcCoy @ Mar 15 2022 11:35pm)
you are talking to fenderp, that dipshit is constantly not even trying to have a discussion, everything not agreeing with him is propaganda, hack, bot, whatever, while insulting you directly or via some passive aggressiveness like a fucking rat

dont even bother, you could make 100% pro west/nato posts from now on and probably be called putins double agent or so


at this point, your probably right.

This post was edited by ferdia on Mar 15 2022 05:49pm
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Mar 15 2022 05:50pm
Quote (ferdia @ 15 Mar 2022 19:42)
here let me helpfully prevent you from double posting, again. but also ~



at this point, your probably right.

he is right. fender makes rpg look like plato in terms of discourse
Member
Posts: 33,771
Joined: May 9 2009
Gold: 3.33
Mar 15 2022 05:55pm
Quote (fender @ Mar 15 2022 11:39pm)
fair enough, then it's true. even though russia's military was apparently criminally overrated and severely eroded by corruption, they'd still have the upper hand. almost like it's the point of nukes and defensive alliances that not every country has to maintain massive standing armies any more...

€dit: let's be real though, picking germany is a bit misleading. we might be the dominant economic power, but our armed forces are famously useless these days. i'd wager the frenchies or the brits could give the russians a real run for their money in such a scenario, considering how long it takes them to deal with ukraine...


Yes, I think France, UK and maybe Italy would be able to successfully defend itself with no outside assistance. Britain is an island with a very good navy and air force, so the perfect place for defensive operations. France has the strongest military in Europe on paper
Member
Posts: 56,268
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,205.03
Mar 15 2022 05:57pm
Quote (excellence @ Mar 15 2022 11:50pm)
he is right. fender makes rpg look like plato in terms of discourse


probably has 300 life on his zon as well :thumbsup:
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Mar 15 2022 05:58pm
Quote (ferdia @ 16 Mar 2022 00:36)
a nuance - de-escalation, before Russia invaded. I dont think any de-escalation can happen over the next few weeks or so, noting, again, regardless of what both sides are saying re: talks -- from what I have read, the sides Ukraine vs Russia AND West vs Russia are so far apart as to make de-escalation right now impossible. I am not looking at this exclusively from Putin's perspective, so to reiterate:

The West wants a trade deal with the Ukraine, they are also very happy to let Ukraine into the EU and Nato (accept this does not happen overnight and takes years).
Ukraine wants a trade deal with the West. they are also very happy to be let into the EU and Nato (accept this does not happen overnight and takes years).
Putin (read: Russia) was happy for Ukraine to do its own thing, provided it did not become his enemy. Talk and movements re: Trade Deal, EU, Nato and political movements in Ukraine made him see Ukraine as a potential enemy on his doorstep.

The West and Russia discussed Russia's concerns. The West did not agree with Russia and did not acknowledge Russia's red lines. The talks failed. Russia invaded.

If you disagree with any of that let me know. stating facts is not the same thing as being a war apologist.


yes, i strongly disagree with the implication that just because pootin says he feels like NATO / EU talks with ukraine makes them his "enemy" that we simply accept this as a valid position, and deny the ukrainian people freedom just because their neighbour doesn't like it.

also, you are once again ignoring 2014. russia already invaded ukraine. they were already hostile occupiers, military aggressors, violating international law. twisting yourself into a pretzel to portray them as the aggrieved party is absurd.

but hey, i guess you rather fraternise with ampootin, the boot-licking npc, who also repeatedly spread blatant russian propaganda here, suggesting a possible russian invasion was just made up by "the west", treating pootin's announcement of troop withdrawal as proof of that, and buying into the moronic "de-nazification" narrative... why am i not surprised you like that guy, lol?
Member
Posts: 4,621
Joined: Jan 30 2021
Gold: 751.50
Mar 15 2022 06:01pm
lets totally forget how the glorious ukranian army bombed their own people first, when they didnt agree with the maidan coup

nice attempt to rewrite history

Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev11841851861871885001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll