Quote (ferdia @ 15 Mar 2022 21:38)
regional security.
/e we have said this alot in the last few weeks. if u cant comprehend or agree with this, lets move on from this.
i asked you what alternative did russia have, your response was "dont invade". if they dont invade, ukraine joins nato, and russia then has another border issue with missiles pointed at it. what safeguard does russia have to prevent this? diplomacy did not work.
they'd achieve exactly that with de-escalation, normalisation, and trade.
no one in their right mind would attack russia, and pootin knows that. the nation with the most nukes on this planet is 100% safe from military attacks by NATO members. so you'll have to come up with something better to support your claim that russia HAD to go to war, because that talking point is comprehensively debunked.
you know what causes the exact opposite of "regional security"? starting a war. so please, try again, or finally admit that your silly narrative that war was "inevitable" is bullshit.
Quote (thesnipa @ 15 Mar 2022 21:30)
The relationship with Russia is one of trading, and escalating military conflict. it has been before, during, and after the Cold War. an ideological battle of democracy vs communism shifted to a battle of democracy vs dictatorship. post-Cold War when the USSR disbanded there was of course a spurt of increase in trade, what was before persona non grata became a trade ally while they settled as a new governing body, and the west hoping they'd land on the side of democracy. they didn't, and since then tensions have returned and Russia has become an oil/gas market for the west with not much else.
look at this list:
as NATO grows the countries within NATO will still trade roughly the same amount of gas/oil/etc, but the countries on it's fringe that may buy things like cars, machinery, computers, etc if they're in the Kremlin's sphere become less likely to do so. these industries are Russia's only chance to escape its fate as a mining and natural resource heavy economy, which while still important relegates it to a mediocre potential. weapons are another way Russia can make a lot of money, and when countries join NATO they dont buy Russian arms. they buy NATO arms, and point them at Russia pre-emptively.
of course this does all stem from Russia's failure to modernize and democratize post-USSR. i dont lay the fault at the west's feet like bootlicker DJ does.
not buying it. pootin might be mad as a box of frogs, but even he did not think that the relatively small ukrainian market would be instrumental in transitioning russia from a resource focused to a manufacturing (?!) economy - not that that ever was his plan, no clue how you came up with this tbh. also, russia's foreign trade has continually increased - despite "the west" being aware that it's not a democracy, and despite the tensions in syria and ukraine...