d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Random Pard Crap
Prev1171819202189Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Feb 1 2020 10:27am
Quote (fender @ 1 Feb 2020 11:22)
this is comedy gold...

what’s comedy gold is the sheer number of lies you lump into your frequent rage essays lmfao. no wonder you think the 2nd and 3rd reichs (led by a kaiser and the national socialists) were victorious in the World Wars they started :wacko:

keep denying your reality fender:
Quote (fender @ 12 Dec 2016 09:11)
FFS WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?! STOP PLAYING STUPID, I'VE EXPLAINED IT MULTIPLE TIMES NOW!
YOU'RE NOT A BIGOT FOR POINTING OUT PROBLEMS OR HAVING A DIFFERENT OPINION, YOU'RE A BIGOT FOR MAKING BIGOTED STATEMENTS!


Quote (fender @ 23 Nov 2016 16:55)
otamendi... looks like de bruyne's pathetic card waving in the 1st half payed off already... what a bunch of faggots...


Quote (fender @ 23 Nov 2016 18:36)
if you're talking to me, i used the term "faggot" to refer to players who put on a show for the ref


Quote (fender @ 4 Feb 2017 16:15)
call me heinrich, nazi, bigot, homophobe, anti-turk


Quote (fender @ 18 Feb 2018 10:59)
as a matter of fact, these days WE are being invaded by polaks searching for mostly unskilled manual labour here.


Quote (fender @ 25 Oct 2017 11:21)
"edgy" white trash teenager


Quote (fender @ 27 Oct 2019 13:39)
you have been raped for wearing that skirt, because you didn't take self-defense classes, and because you belong to a gender that enables others to physically overpower you

Fender's opinions of minorities on d2jsp
Quote (fender @ 25 May 2017 19:26)
brainwashed monkeys, haha...


Quote (fender @ 4 Oct 2017 19:10)
brown ppl are just lazy and want everything done for them


e: reported, btw

This post was edited by excellence on Feb 1 2020 10:27am
Member
Posts: 54,128
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Feb 1 2020 10:29am
Quote (fender @ 1 Feb 2020 17:22)
like i said... and you don't see the irony and hypocrisy in trump of all people 'cautioning' against what exactly? unfaithfulness? lack of morals? unchristian behaviour? this is hilarious... the guy who cheated on his three wives countless times, raped one, has countless further allegations of sexual misconduct against him, proudly admitted to walking into teen girls dressing rooms to see them naked, was a regular attendant on epstein's kiddy fiddler sex parties, cheated on his pregnant wife, paid off hookers and pornstars, defended pedophiles and spousal abusers... he is a moral authority for you, and you genuinely don't see how ridiculous that is? this is comedy gold...


I dont give a damn about Trump's personal life, and I surely dont see him as a moral authority, never did, never will.

Similarly, I wouldnt care about Omar's personal life if it didnt touch on specific policy and political issues, namely her marriage and immigration fraud, her silencing of critics using blatant violence (or the threat thereof), and the way the mainstream media is complicit in all of this by staying silent.
Trump's personal transgressions dont touch on specific policy, he to the best of my knowledge never silenced any of these women with violence/goons, and the media has extensively covered all of it.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Feb 1 2020 10:32am
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Feb 1 2020 10:39am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 1 Feb 2020 17:29)
I dont give a damn about Trump's personal life, and I surely dont see him as a moral authority, never did, never will.

Similarly, I wouldnt care about Omar's personal life if it didnt touch on specific policy and political issues, namely her marriage and immigration fraud, her silencing of critics using blatant violence (or the threat thereof), and the way the mainstream media is complicit in all of this by staying silent.
Trump's personal transgressions dont touch on specific policy, he to the best of my knowledge never silenced any of these women with violence/goons, and the media has extensively covered all of it.


it's simply mindblowing how you people constantly manage to delude yourselves into believing your massive hypocrisy and double standards aren't glaringly obvious to everyone. pretending like violating campaign finance law is not politically relevant, his friendship with epstein, his support for pedophiles and spousal abusers for political reasons... yet somehow omar's private life has more relevance than the presidents... just... wow...

let's be real, you muppet. you talk shit about her because she's brown and muslim. you talk shit about her because she's an outspoken trump critic. you talk shit about her to deflect from your cult leader's shortcomings. you have no principles, so who do you think you're fooling?

This post was edited by fender on Feb 1 2020 10:40am
Member
Posts: 54,128
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Feb 1 2020 11:51am
Quote (fender @ 1 Feb 2020 17:39)
violating campaign finance law

*yawn*

Quote
his friendship with epstein


Pretty much every person of public life from NYC was friends or acquainted with Epstein, including Bill and Hillary Clinton and former mayor of NYC and current (D) candidate for president, Michael Bloomberg.

Quote
his support for pedophiles


source for this outlandish claim?

Quote
and spousal abusers for political reasons


to whom are you referring? not saying you're wrong on this one, but I cant quite remember such a case.

Quote
yet somehow omar's private life has more relevance than the presidents... just... wow...

I never claimed that her private life was more relevant than the president's.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Feb 1 2020 11:52am
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Feb 1 2020 01:16pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 1 Feb 2020 18:51)
*yawn*


inconvenient facts trigger displacement activity like yawning. caught between lying and denying, huh?

Quote (Black XistenZ @ 1 Feb 2020 18:51)
Pretty much every person of public life from NYC was friends or acquainted with Epstein, including Bill and Hillary Clinton and former mayor of NYC and current (D) candidate for president, Michael Bloomberg.


yeah right, keep telling yourself that. there is a difference between simply knowing the guy on the one hand, and attending multiple of his sex parties, even when those two were the only 'guests' (of age), writing glowing reviews about his character including a description of their shared love of young girls.

Quote (Black XistenZ @ 1 Feb 2020 18:51)
source for this outlandish claim?


repression is a powerful force, huh? remember roy moore?

Quote (Black XistenZ @ 1 Feb 2020 18:51)
to whom are you referring? not saying you're wrong on this one, but I cant quite remember such a case.


repression is a powerful force, huh? remember rob porter?

Quote (Black XistenZ @ 1 Feb 2020 18:51)
I never claimed that her private life was more relevant than the president's.


you might not have used those exact words, but you have been practicing and defending it, so please spare me the 'acktshuallys'...
Member
Posts: 54,128
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Feb 1 2020 02:23pm
Quote (fender @ 1 Feb 2020 20:16)
inconvenient facts trigger displacement activity like yawning. caught between lying and denying, huh?

I'm just pointing out that nobody really cares about minor campaign finance violations.


Quote
yeah right, keep telling yourself that. there is a difference between simply knowing the guy on the one hand, and attending multiple of his sex parties, even when those two were the only 'guests' (of age), writing glowing reviews about his character including a description of their shared love of young girls.


Trump told the media that he and Epstein had a shared love of beautiful women, not 'younger' ones, and that Epstein liked them "on the younger side". Your attempts at writing Trump into the vincinity of pedophilia are pathetic.

Here is a nice overview from the left-leaning and certainly not Trump-affine vox:
https://www.vox.com/2019/7/9/20686347/jeffrey-epstein-trump-bill-clinton

In particular, note what the article has to say about accusations of Epstein-related wrongdoing by Trump:

Quote
The 2009 subpoena: In 2009, Brad Edwards, an attorney who has represented various Epstein victims, had Trump served with a subpoena for testimony in a case against Epstein.

But Edwards is not alleging any wrongdoing from Trump; rather, the opposite. He said in a recent interview that he had served subpoenas on many connected people in 2009, and that Trump was “the only person who picked up the phone and said, ‘Let’s just talk. I’ll give you as much time as you want.’”

Edwards added that Trump “was very helpful, in the information that he gave,” calling it “good information that checked out and that helped us.”
And, he said, Trump “gave no indication whatsoever that he was involved in anything untoward whatsoever.”

Virginia Roberts’s lawsuit: In 1999, 16-year-old Virginia Roberts worked as a spa attendant at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort. It was there, she says, that Epstein’s girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell recruited her to give massages to Epstein at his house. But Roberts (who now goes by Virginia Giuffre) hasn’t accused Trump of any wrongdoing, and her previous status as a Mar-a-Lago employee is the only connection to Trump.

The Katie Johnson lawsuit: This is the only accusation against Trump for Epstein-related wrongdoing. An anonymous woman sued Trump in 2016, claiming that in 1994, he violently raped her at an orgy hosted by Epstein. She said she was 13 years old at the time, and accused Epstein of raping her as well. She first filed suit in California under the name “Katie Johnson,” and when it was thrown out there for technical reasons, she filed it in New York under “Jane Doe.”

But many journalists were wary about this claim. There was no corroborating evidence offered (except for affidavits from two anonymous people claiming to have been told of or witnessed it), and the suit appeared “to have been orchestrated by an eccentric anti-Trump campaigner with a record of making outlandish claims about celebrities,” the Guardian’s Jon Swaine wrote. Jezebel’s Anna Merlan tried for some time to get to the bottom of what was going on and concluded in June 2016, “The facts speak less to a scandal and more, perhaps, to an attempt at a smear.”


So even journalists from the liberal and staunchly anti-Trump Guardian come to the conclusion that the only Epstein-related allegation against Trump is most likely bogus.


Quote
repression is a powerful force, huh? remember roy moore?

Roy Moore is not a pedophile?! The guy is a scumbag and a reprehensible human being, and it certainly reflects badly on Trump that he defended him, but Moore still only ever approached teenage girls, not pre-pubescent girls. Hence, he's not a pedophile, and thus, your claim that Trump defended a pedophile in Roy Moore is false.


Quote
repression is a powerful force, huh? remember rob porter?


Trump refused to take sides against Porter without airtight proof, but didnt claim he was innocent.
Quote
Asked by reporters two days after Porter's resignation, President Donald Trump commented, "He said very strongly yesterday that he's innocent so you have to talk to him about that, but we absolutely wish him well, he did a very good job when he was at the White House."


Also, how on earth is Trump's alleged support for Porter amid allegations of domestic abuse something that he did "out of political reasons"? Porter held a non-political post as the WH staff secretary...

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Feb 1 2020 02:26pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 1 2020 02:47pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Feb 1 2020 02:23pm)
I'm just pointing out that nobody really cares about minor campaign finance violations.


Besides, ya know, Fender, I don't know anybody who takes the Epstein allegation on Trump seriously.

I've made the connection a few times as a snarky way to jab at conservatives who did the same thing to Obama. I think Trump probably knew about Epstein's shady behaviors based solely on a few of his comments, most notably the "he loves women as much as me, but a little younger" comment.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Feb 1 2020 03:00pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 1 Feb 2020 21:23)
I'm just pointing out that nobody really cares about minor campaign finance violations.




Trump told the media that he and Epstein had a shared love of beautiful women, not 'younger' ones, and that Epstein liked them "on the younger side". Your attempts at writing Trump into the vincinity of pedophilia are pathetic.

Here is a nice overview from the left-leaning and certainly not Trump-affine vox:
https://www.vox.com/2019/7/9/20686347/jeffrey-epstein-trump-bill-clinton

In particular, note what the article has to say about accusations of Epstein-related wrongdoing by Trump:



So even journalists from the liberal and staunchly anti-Trump Guardian come to the conclusion that the only Epstein-related allegation against Trump is most likely bogus.



Roy Moore is not a pedophile?! The guy is a scumbag and a reprehensible human being, and it certainly reflects badly on Trump that he defended him, but Moore still only ever approached teenage girls, not pre-pubescent girls. Hence, he's not a pedophile, and thus, your claim that Trump defended a pedophile in Roy Moore is false.




Trump refused to take sides against Porter without airtight proof, but didnt claim he was innocent.


Also, how on earth is Trump's alleged support for Porter amid allegations of domestic abuse something that he did "out of political reasons"? Porter held a non-political post as the WH staff secretary...


Member
Posts: 54,128
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Feb 1 2020 03:56pm
Quote (fender @ 1 Feb 2020 22:00)


there's a world of a difference, whether you acknowledge it or not.

it's not deviant or unsual at all for men to be able to feel attracted to females which, in a biological sense, are sexually mature and able to get pregnant, just because they are too young to be considered viable based on various cultural (and good!) reasons. of course, adult men acting on this attraction would be problematic and condemnable, but there's nothing wrong with this attraction itself.

by contrast, it is deviant and hugely problematic for a man to feel attracted to pre-pubescent girls.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Feb 1 2020 03:57pm
Member
Posts: 50,826
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,846.00
Feb 2 2020 09:48pm
heard somewhere in some office before the superbowl;

"So, are we going with the hyper sexualized female gyrating and pelvic thrusting of scantily clad women, or a chorus of schoolgirls?"
"Yes"
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1171819202189Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll