d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Drag V. Church - Child Abuse News
Prev11718192021180Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
May 22 2023 12:10pm
Quote (JessiWan @ May 22 2023 01:10pm)
Maybe this is because Trans people are widely disliked.


So are you.
Member
Posts: 22,264
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
May 22 2023 12:11pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ May 22 2023 11:10am)
So are you.


Nah. Only by weak-minded people like you.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
May 22 2023 12:18pm
Quote (JessiWan @ May 22 2023 01:11pm)
Nah. Only by weak-minded people like you.


Oh the irony
Member
Posts: 22,264
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
May 22 2023 12:18pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ May 22 2023 11:18am)
Oh the irony


Nope.

;P

Member
Posts: 50
Joined: May 3 2023
Gold: 76.00
May 22 2023 12:23pm
This is a classic level of "if you can't beat them, bring them down to your level then beat them with experience"

The entire argument initially has people in the middle of the pack going "oh that sounds kind of reasonable" then showing them something out of context and selling it home

Same reason why most white people in predominantly low crime white areas cannot understand why the police are racially motivated, and often times violent towards innocent minorities, even when provided proof, because the skew of the proof and the source always wins.

Put the idea that any kind of leather material on a gay man is inherently sexual, and suddenly every child that gay man even walks near on any given day is being "sexually groomed" opening up a literal storm of definition bending to throw violence that mans way. This becomes doubly more effective to minorities that can be more harshly scrutinized under definition bending, transgender people in particular.

The real reason why these organizations created the drag show arguments was because it was the easiest way to not only target members of the LGBT community that were only LGB, but an extremely easy way to throw T under the bus even harder by asserting that transgender women, and transgender men, were inherently dressing in drag which is now being definition bent to mean grooming children, just by simply dressing by their identified gender.

And notice I haven't even touched the subject of what religion does to children on a regular, much more consistently proven basis.
Member
Posts: 22,264
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
May 22 2023 12:27pm
Quote (songofadarkstar @ May 22 2023 11:23am)

Put the idea that any kind of leather material on a gay man is inherently sexual, and suddenly every child that gay man even walks near on any given day is being "sexually groomed"


Leather on a gay is man is sexual in the same way that a woman's bra is sexual. Both are things that kids shouldn't be exposed to.
Member
Posts: 54,186
Joined: Feb 15 2006
Gold: 62,160.16
May 22 2023 12:31pm
Quote (JessiWan @ May 22 2023 11:27am)
Leather on a gay is man is sexual in the same way that a woman's bra is sexual. Both are things that kids shouldn't be exposed to.


I guess kids are banned from all beaches then. :rofl:
Member
Posts: 22,264
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
May 22 2023 12:34pm
Quote (pwb3 @ May 22 2023 11:31am)
I guess kids are banned from all beaches then. :rofl:


Women wear swim suits on beaches. They look similar to bras but are not the same.

If I go by your "logic", then kids should also stay away from a gay man who wears a watch with leather straps, because that is also "leather material on a gay man". But that would be stupid.
Member
Posts: 3,908
Joined: Jun 20 2022
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
May 22 2023 12:34pm
Quote (thesnipa @ May 22 2023 12:08pm)
obligatory: i havent physically been to any, i'm just reading second hand.

I think the issue is mostly a problem of presenting evidence to minds that aren't even able to comprehend it with very little room for a counter argument. like am i a person who thinks that "there are only 2 genders" or "be proud to be white" narratives hold water? no, they're a reaction and largely as or more toxic. but the idea that you can't EVER publicly present them while the other side can is problematic. presenting ideas of gender fluidity to young children at all to me is an issue, mostly just due to statistics. even VERY optimistic studies show that maybe 1/100 kids are trans. so why present the evidence to a whole range of children? especially at ages they aren't able to take it in? better imo to identify cases and deal with them individually. along the same vein is the books in libraries about masturbation or sexual exploration. sure, all kids do it, but i dont see a reason for that to ever be a publicly available book. its a footnote in the yearly sex ed program and beyond that leave it up to parents.



it shouldn't be tho, at all.

i'm sure if i loosely defined someone as a racist you'd be quite upset, because you understand the social stigma that places on them.

we live in a society that loosely defines stigmatizing terms for weaponization, and that's lowbrow thinking that will come for us all in the end. good luck explaining that you're not a "sexual abuser of children" after you get called that because you took off your top at a public beach with children present.

this behavior isn't even by-and-large illegal. we shouldn't apply a term with that level of recourse to something that is legal in most states.



If somebody loosely used the word “racist” I would simply explain how it isn’t racist if it was even worth having the conversation.

If you don’t thing bringing a child to a sexualized performance is not sexual abuse I would expect the same from you, not to get upset but to explain how you think it isn’t abusive.

As to your topless at the beach analogy, that is different. The sunbather is not putting on a performance, not is she reaching out to children. There is no topless sunbathing for children events at public libraries. There are no topless sunbathing parades on Main Street. At the point a parent sees a topless sunbather, they will correctly find a different place for their children to play without tits in full view. It is doubtful a parent would bring a child to a topless beach to begin with, and doing so knowingly is borderline.
Member
Posts: 54,186
Joined: Feb 15 2006
Gold: 62,160.16
May 22 2023 12:36pm
Quote (JessiWan @ May 22 2023 11:34am)
Women wear swim suits on beaches. They look similar to bras but are not the same.

If I go by your "logic", then kids should also stay away from a gay man who wears a watch with leather straps, because that is also "leather material on a gay man". But that would be stupid.


They are literally the same. Just different material but literally the same thing. You’re just being very stupid on purpose to troll us. You are very transparent.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev11718192021180Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll