Secret service were the closest people to trump that deny the claims of the walking blonde cock sucker. I’m in shock that you’ve never seen a prostitute before

This post was edited by Landmine on Jul 22 2022 11:23pm

wut?
And you don't believe trumps personal wh lawyer.
Bill Barr the staffers etc.
All those lawyers on video tape.. smh
nobody defending trump under oath?
I guess chalk you up as = TI/Defendor etc. the ONLY person not paid is trump
god damn HRC and Soros run the planet? LOL

what finances it would be the deep state banks. deep state banks only ones in the world with money ev1 else in debt to them.
HRC and soros and wef would just be high level minions

The Januarygate hearings are a stacked court. The R or Maga R folks aren't allowed to answer truthfully.
This is just like the impeachment hearings.

The only answers that are accepted are the ones the Dems want to hear. It's a kangaroo court.

to be fair without 50/50 representation from both sides it was ever going to be a kangaroo count.

Even with 50/50 representation it was a kangaroo court.
The impeachment hearings were a joke.
They were using two completely different sets of rules for the Dems and the Reps.

at the most basic level trump incited his followers and a riot ensued. i think all sides should be able to agree with that. however, what that means for trump, for republicans, for america, i have no clue. if i was the arbiter i would bar him from senior positions in the government, but thats just me. before ppl jump on me, i already said yesterday he had some good (and some bad!) policies / decisions. he overplayed his hand at the time.

This post was edited by ferdia on Jul 23 2022 01:07am

um.. they have the opportunity to testify? wut?

How did Trump incite a riot? Was it his multiple calls for peaceful political mobilization that precede the riot, or his call for deescalation and telling people to go home in peace, when it broke out? Trump didn't use any of the incendiary rhetoric and overt calls for escalation that Democrats are using all the time, see Maxine Waters and all the SCOTUS intimidation. Heck Lee Zeldin's opponent was using more charged language against him, and a deranged guy tried to stab him, is that the democrat's fault?

Trump blustered along like usual and refused to take accountability for his loss. He didn't direct imminent violence. Theres a difference between being a blowhard and a firebrand, and its not subtle, and no amount of DNC projection given primetime slots by a colluding media will ever change that nothing Trump has ever said or sone measures up to even 1/100 of what Democrats incites in Minneapolis after George Floyd

im not close to this so forgive me while i catch up. i would say his tweets on the day were negative (re: voter fraud, undermining/questioning the process) while accepting that his tweets re: no violence were pretty black and white (i.e. attempt at deescalating). I had read several books about this, but did not following the hearing. what item(s) are currently being used against him in the hearing?

This post was edited by ferdia on Jul 23 2022 01:26am